Skip to content

FLDZ vs TSSD

TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF

FLDZBCboe

Truth Social American Security & Defense ETF

TSSDCNYSE Arca

Overlap

20.1%by weight

Expense ratio

FLDZ −0.25pt a year

FLDZ0.40%TSSD0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

TSSD 15.4×the volume

FLDZ125TSSD1.93K

FLDZ vs TSSD Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−8.1%FLDZ+20.9%TSSD

Dec 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. FLDZ −8.1%. TSSD +20.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%30%Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FLDZ 0.40%, better
TSSD 0.65%
Fund size
FLDZ $7M
TSSD $7M
1Y total return
FLDZ −6.8%
TSSD No data
Yield (12M)
FLDZ 1.67%
TSSD No data
Holdings
FLDZ 66
TSSD 63
Avg volume (30D)
FLDZ 125 sh
TSSD 1.93K sh, better
NAV per share
FLDZ $26.38
TSSD $30.45
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLDZ: Cost 76, Risk 42, Mission 42, Tradability 36, Holdings 92, Durability 62. TSSD: Cost 26, Risk 82, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings 43, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLDZ, TSSD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLDZTSSD
Cost30% weightA76HigherD26
Mission25% weightC42Not scored
Risk15% weightC42A82Higher
Tradability15% weightD36C47Higher
Holdings10% weightA92HigherC43
Durability5% weightB62HigherC41

Rank among Defense & Aerospace funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLDZ and TSSD are both graded against the same 25 Defense & Aerospace funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Defense & Aerospace⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

FLDZ ranks 3rd and TSSD 12th of 25 funds in the Defense & Aerospace Category.

  1. Rank 1AXARState Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AITAiShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 3BFLDZTrueShares Patriot Defense ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BFOWFPacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 11CEUADSelect STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 12CTSSDTruth Social American Security & Defense ETFScore 44
  7. Rank 12CWDAFWisdomTree Asia Defense FundScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLDZBTrueShares Patriot Defense ETF

TSSDCTruth Social American Security & Defense ETF

In short

FLDZ A defense-stock ETF with an unusual arrangement: the adviser's management fee, less fund expenses, goes to the Folds of Honor Foundation. Launched in 2021 as a patriot-themed core equity fund, it now runs an active, concentrated book of aerospace and defense names.

TSSD Defense investing with a brand on the box. TSSD is Trump Media's Truth.Fi entry into the sector, tracking a MarketVector index of US national defense and cyber security companies built on an America-first rulebook.

Stated mandate

FLDZ The Fund seeks capital growth.

TSSD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the MarketVectorTM American Security & Defense Index.

Why people hold it

  • FLDZ The adviser's management fee, less fund operating expenses, goes to Folds of Honor, a charity funding scholarships for families of fallen or disabled service members and first responders.true-shares.comtrue-shares.com 2
  • Charges 0.40% a year, below the median for its actively managed US stock peers. The charitable angle does not arrive with a premium price tag attached.
  • The mandate is spelled out: at least 80% of net assets in aerospace and defense companies as classified by GICS, with a policy of concentrating in that industry. No guessing what you own.sec.gov
  • TSSD The mandate is written down: it tracks the MarketVector American Security & Defense Index, a US defense and cyber security basket reviewed on a set semi-annual schedule.marketvector.com
  • Wider lens than classic aerospace-and-defense sleeves such as XAR and ITA: the index reaches into cyber security alongside the traditional hardware names.marketvector.com
  • Plain plumbing. A 1940 Act equity fund following a published index, not a derivatives package you need a decoder ring to read.

Worth knowing

  • FLDZ The strategy was rewritten in 2026 from broad US-economy equities to defense companies, so the fund's older track record reflects a different portfolio.sec.govsec.gov 2
  • Non-diversified and concentrated in one industry, so a single contract award or budget headline moves it more than it would a broad market fund.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so bid-ask spreads tend to run wider than on heavily traded ETFs. Limit orders matter more here.
  • TSSD At 0.65% a year it runs above the defense cohort's 0.50% median and well above the big trackers (XAR at 0.35%, ITA at 0.37%).
  • A December 2025 launch, still small and lightly traded, so spreads can run wider than the category's heavyweights. Limit orders are the usual answer.
  • The branding is part of the product: it comes from Trump Media's Truth.Fi line via sponsor Yorkville America Equities, so news about the parent company travels with the fund.sec.gov

Full FLDZ profile⁠

Full TSSD profile⁠

FLDZ vs TSSD Holdings

How FLDZ and TSSD differ

Overlap by weight

20.1%

Shared holdings make up 46.4% of TSSD and 38.5% of FLDZ.

Level by level

  • Holdings24 in both20.1%
  • Countryby domicile84.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for TSSD.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FLDZ and TSSD, widest gap first
CountryMore in FLDZMore in TSSD
United StatesTSSD +15.9 points
United KingdomFLDZ +4.8 points
GermanyFLDZ +3.1 points
FranceFLDZ +3.0 points
SwedenFLDZ +1.8 points
ItalyFLDZ +1.7 points
NetherlandsFLDZ +1.6 points
IsraelTSSD +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FLDZ18.7%
  • TSSD62.7%

Securities held

  • FLDZ66
  • TSSD62

Asset class

FLDZ
Equity
TSSD
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FLDZ42
  • In both24
  • Only in TSSD38

Only in FLDZ

42 securities, 61.5% of FLDZ by weight

  • Textron Inc1.85%
  • Saab AB1.79%
  • HEICO Corp1.73%

Only in TSSD

38 securities, 53.2% of TSSD by weight

  • Palo Alto Networks Inc9.02%
  • Crowdstrike Holdings Inc8.72%
  • Cloudflare Inc4.99%

Weight gaps

All 24 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FLDZ and TSSD, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FLDZMore in TSSD
Palantir Technologies IncPLTRTSSD +8.21 points
Rtx CorporationRTXTSSD +5.12 points
Lockheed Martin CorpLMTTSSD +4.32 points
General Dynamics CorpGDTSSD +2.95 points
Northrop Grumman CorpNOCTSSD +2.25 points
Cadre Holdings IncCDREFLDZ +1.81 points
L3Harris Technologies IncLHXTSSD +1.67 points
Axon Enterprise IncAXONTSSD +1.60 points

All 66 FLDZ holdings⁠All 64 TSSD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLDZ vs TSSD Cost

Overpaying TSSD vs FLDZ

$4,627

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLDZ 0.40%

    $8,090

  • TSSD 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLDZ 0.40%
  • TSSD 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530TSSD $12,717FLDZ $8,090

Year by year

YearFLDZTSSDOverpaying
10$723$1,163$440
20$2,793$4,440$1,647
30$8,090$12,717$4,627

Expense ratio

  • 0.40%FLDZ, cheaper
  • 0.65%TSSD
  • Middle half of Defense & Aerospace funds
  • Median 0.50%

FLDZ 6th cheapest of 25 funds

TSSD 18th cheapest of 25 funds

FLDZ vs TSSD Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLDZ 1.67%
TSSD No data
Payout (12M)
FLDZ $0.45
TSSD No data
Last payment
FLDZ $0.45
TSSD $0.0072
Ex-dividend
FLDZ Dec 24, 2025
TSSD Jun 24, 2026
Paid on
FLDZ Dec 26, 2025
TSSD Jun 25, 2026
Frequency
FLDZ Annual
TSSD Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

FLDZAnnual · 4 paymentsAll FLDZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2022 $0.33; Dec 27, 2023 $0.33; Dec 27, 2024 $0.32; Dec 24, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
TSSDQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll TSSD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Feb 25, 2026 $0.0069; Mar 25, 2026 $0.01; Jun 24, 2026 $0.0072. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

FLDZ vs TSSD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLDZ 14.5%TSSD No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLDZ 0.35TSSD No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLDZ −25.1%since Jan 2022TSSD No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLDZ 0.77TSSD 0.52

Popular comparisons

  • FLDZBvsXARA

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSSDCvsXARA

    Truth Social American Security & Defense ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLDZBvsITAA

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSSDCvsITAA

    Truth Social American Security & Defense ETF · iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLDZBvsFOWFB

    TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF · Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSSDCvsFOWFB

    Truth Social American Security & Defense ETF · Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.