FLGV ranks 4th and LDRT 7th of 16 funds in the US Treasury & Government Category.
FLGV vs LDRT
LDRT −0.02pt a year
0.09%0.07%
FLGV 2.0×the volume
230K114K
FLGV vs LDRT Performance
−0.2%+1.8%
- FLGV 0.09%
- LDRT 0.07%, better
- FLGV $1.24B
- LDRT $264M
- FLGV −0.2%
- LDRT +1.8%, better
- FLGV 4.58%, better
- LDRT 3.73%
- FLGV 66
- LDRT 191
- FLGV 230K sh, better
- LDRT 114K sh
- FLGV $19.84
- LDRT $24.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLGV | LDRT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A80Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | C40 |
| Risk | C48 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | C50Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | C53 | B68Higher |
| Durability | B58Higher | C47 |
Rank among US Treasury & Government funds
Same Category. FLGV and LDRT are both graded against the same 16 US Treasury & Government funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLGVB
LDRTB
In short
FLGV Treasuries only, anywhere from 1 to 30 years, in one ticker. Franklin charges 0.09%, under the typical fee in its Treasury peer group, and the income lands monthly.
LDRT A bond ladder in one ticker. LDRT holds a stack of iShares iBonds Treasury funds maturing inside six years, and the index keeps the rungs in place so you are not the one rolling them.
Stated mandate
FLGV The Fund seeks income and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in direct U.S. Treasury obligations and related Treasury exposures. It may hold Treasury securities of any maturity, with primary emphasis on remaining maturities from 1 to 30 years.
LDRT The fund tracks an index of iShares iBonds Treasury ETFs with maturities below six years, providing exposure to a ladder of U.S. Treasury bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLGV vs LDRT Holdings
How FLGV and LDRT differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for FLGV.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FLGVMore in LDRT | FLGV | LDRT |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- FLGV44.6%
- LDRT11.5%
- FLGV63
- LDRT189
Asset class
- FLGV
- Fixed Income
- LDRT
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. FLGV holds 63 securities, LDRT 189.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLGV vs LDRT Cost
Overpaying FLGV vs LDRT
$418
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLGV 0.09%
$1,898
LDRT 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLGV | LDRT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $128 | $37 |
| 20 | $646 | $503 | $143 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $1,480 | $418 |
- 0.09%FLGV
- 0.07%LDRT, cheaper
- Middle half of US Treasury & Government funds
- Median 0.15%
LDRT 4th cheapest of 16 funds
FLGV 5th cheapest of 16 funds
FLGV vs LDRT Dividends
- FLGV 4.58%, better
- LDRT 3.73%
- FLGV $0.91
- LDRT $0.93
- FLGV $0.07
- LDRT $0.07
- FLGV Nov 2, 2026
- LDRT Oct 2, 2026
- FLGV Pays Nov 5, 2026
- LDRT Oct 7, 2026
- FLGV Monthly
- LDRT Monthly
Distribution history
FLGV vs LDRT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLGV 5.1%LDRT 2.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLGV −0.01LDRT −0.38
- Worst fall
- FLGV −14.8%LDRT −1.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FLGV 0.88LDRT 0.002
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.