FLJP ranks 1st and HEWJ 16th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
FLJP vs HEWJ
FLJP −0.93pt a year
0.09%1.02%
FLJP 15.6×the volume
976K62.6K
HEWJ +11.3pt
+9.2%+20.5%
FLJP vs HEWJ Performance
+55.0%+153.8%
- FLJP 0.09%, better
- HEWJ 1.02%
- FLJP $4.27B
- HEWJ $625M
- FLJP +16.4%
- HEWJ +22.4%, better
- FLJP 4.26%, better
- HEWJ 4.18%
- FLJP 447
- HEWJ 171
- FLJP 976K sh, better
- HEWJ 62.6K sh
- FLJP $39.98
- HEWJ $62.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLJP | HEWJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F9 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C48 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A71 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | C52 |
| Durability | B61 | A76Higher |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. FLJP and HEWJ are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLJPA
HEWJC
In short
FLJP Japan's whole market for nine basis points. FLJP tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index across roughly 500 stocks at 0.09%, a fraction of what the typical Japan fund charges.
HEWJ Japanese stocks with the yen taken out of the equation. Since 2014, HEWJ has tracked MSCI's 100% USD-hedged Japan index, so what drives the fund is the Japanese market, not the currency.
Stated mandate
FLJP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.
HEWJ The fund seeks to track an index of Japanese equities while reducing the effect of yen currency fluctuations.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLJP vs HEWJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLJP vs HEWJ Cost
Overpaying HEWJ vs FLJP
$17,114
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLJP 0.09%
$1,898
HEWJ 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLJP | HEWJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $1,797 | $1,632 |
| 20 | $646 | $6,746 | $6,100 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $19,012 | $17,114 |
- 0.09%FLJP, cheaper
- 1.02%HEWJ
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJP cheapest of 18 funds
HEWJ 17th cheapest of 18 funds
FLJP vs HEWJ Dividends
- FLJP 4.26%, better
- HEWJ 4.18%
- FLJP $1.69
- HEWJ $2.61
- FLJP $0.17
- HEWJ $0.35
- FLJP Jun 26, 2026
- HEWJ Jul 2, 2026
- FLJP Jul 6, 2026
- HEWJ Jul 8, 2026
- FLJP Twice a year
- HEWJ Twice a year
Distribution history
FLJP vs HEWJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLJP
- HEWJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLJP 12.5%HEWJ 12.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FLJP 1.17HEWJ 1.58, better
- Worst fall
- FLJP −28.8%HEWJ −20.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLJP 0.96HEWJ 0.41
FLJP and HEWJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


