Skip to content

FLJP vs JPY

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

FLJPANYSE Arca

Lazard Japanese Equity ETF

JPYCNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

FLJP −0.51pt a year

FLJP0.09%JPY0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

FLJP 222.3×the volume

FLJP976KJPY4.39K

FLJP vs JPY Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+16.4%FLJP+19.0%JPY

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FLJP +16.4%. JPY +19.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%25%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FLJP 0.09%, better
JPY 0.60%
Fund size
FLJP $4.27B
JPY $84M
1Y total return
FLJP +16.4%
JPY +19.0%, better
Yield (12M)
FLJP 4.26%, better
JPY 1.17%
Holdings
FLJP 447
JPY 63
Avg volume (30D)
FLJP 976K sh, better
JPY 4.39K sh
NAV per share
FLJP $39.98
JPY $38.16
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FLJP: Cost 97, Risk 48, Mission 100, Tradability 71, Holdings 74, Durability 61. JPY: Cost 35, Risk 39, Mission 100, Tradability 18, Holdings 42, Durability 17.
Pillar letters and Scores for FLJP, JPY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFLJPJPY
Cost30% weightA97HigherD35
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC48HigherD39
Tradability15% weightA71HigherF18
Holdings10% weightA74HigherC42
Durability5% weightB61HigherF17

Rank among Japan funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FLJP and JPY are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Japan⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

FLJP ranks 1st and JPY 12th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.

  1. Rank 1AFLJPFranklin FTSE Japan ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2ABBJPJPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 12CFJPFirst Trust Japan AlphaDEX FundScore 49
  4. Rank 12CJPYLazard Japanese Equity ETFScore 49
  5. Rank 14CMJSCMUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FLJPAFranklin FTSE Japan ETF

JPYCLazard Japanese Equity ETF

In short

FLJP Japan's whole market for nine basis points. FLJP tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index across roughly 500 stocks at 0.09%, a fraction of what the typical Japan fund charges.

JPY Most Japan ETFs just buy the index. JPY hands the stock picking to Lazard's Japan team, which has run the strategy for decades, and holds a concentrated, non-diversified slice of the market instead.

Stated mandate

FLJP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.

JPY The Portfolio seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • FLJP 0.09% a year, against a Japan-cohort median near 0.50%. Same country, same broad exposure, a fraction of the toll.
  • Roughly 500 names via the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, whose capping rules trim outsized positions so no single stock runs away with the portfolio.
  • Running since 2017 and now a multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund, it tracks its index tightly and ranks among the strongest builds in its Japan peer group.
  • Cheaper than the bigger brand-name Japan trackers it competes with, including EWJ at 0.49% and BBJP at 0.19%.
  • JPY Active, not index-tracking: a local, bilingual Lazard team chooses the names, a rarity in a category where the biggest funds simply replicate a Japan benchmark.lazardassetmanagement.com
  • The prospectus commits at least 80% of net assets to equities traded on Japanese markets, and the portfolio has stayed tightly inside that Japan-only lane.yahoo.com
  • Launched in 2025 as one of Lazard's first US active ETFs, putting a long-running institutional Japan strategy into an exchange-traded wrapper.lazard.com

Worth knowing

  • FLJP The yen rides along. Currency moves hit returns here; Franklin's hedged twin, FLJH, strips that out for the same 0.09%.
  • One country, one market cycle. Everything inside depends on Japan, so this is a slice of a portfolio rather than a diversified core.
  • Distributions land annually or semiannually, not monthly, so cash flow arrives in lumps.
  • JPY Costs 0.60% a year, above the typical Japan fund and well above index trackers like FLJP and FLJH at 0.09%. Research is what the premium buys.
  • A 2025 launch, modest in size and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than at the giant Japan trackers and there is little history to judge.
  • Non-diversified and concentrated: a handful of names drive results, which can land far from the broad Japan market in either direction.yahoo.com

Full FLJP profile⁠

Full JPY profile⁠

FLJP vs JPY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FLJP vs JPY Cost

Overpaying JPY vs FLJP

$9,919

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FLJP 0.09%

    $1,898

  • JPY 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FLJP 0.09%
  • JPY 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530JPY $11,817FLJP $1,898

Year by year

YearFLJPJPYOverpaying
10$165$1,076$911
20$646$4,116$3,470
30$1,898$11,817$9,919

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%FLJP, cheaper
  • 0.60%JPY
  • Middle half of Japan funds
  • Median 0.54%

FLJP cheapest of 18 funds

JPY 12th cheapest of 18 funds

FLJP vs JPY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FLJP 4.26%, better
JPY 1.17%
Payout (12M)
FLJP $1.69
JPY $0.44
Last payment
FLJP $0.17
JPY $0.23
Ex-dividend
FLJP Jun 26, 2026
JPY Jun 18, 2026
Paid on
FLJP Jul 6, 2026
JPY Jun 22, 2026
Frequency
FLJP Twice a year
JPY Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FLJPTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll FLJP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2017 $0.03; Jun 20, 2018 $0.10; Dec 20, 2018 $0.24; Jun 11, 2019 $0.29; Dec 11, 2019 $0.30; Jun 11, 2020 $0.21; Dec 30, 2020 $0.24; Jun 10, 2021 $0.39; Dec 13, 2021 $0.31; Jun 17, 2022 $0.26; Dec 16, 2022 $0.21; Jun 16, 2023 $0.36; Dec 15, 2023 $0.48; Jun 21, 2024 $1.03; Dec 20, 2024 $0.28; Jun 20, 2025 $0.25; Dec 19, 2025 $1.52; Jun 26, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
JPYTwice a year · 3 paymentsAll JPY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2025 $0.55; Dec 19, 2025 $0.21; Jun 18, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

FLJP vs JPY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FLJP 12.5%JPY 14.4%since May 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FLJP 1.17JPY 1.41since May 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FLJP −28.8%JPY −15.1%since Apr 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FLJP 0.96JPY 0.70

FLJP and JPY in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FLJPAvsBBJPA

    Franklin FTSE Japan ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPYCvsBBJPA

    Lazard Japanese Equity ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLJPAvsFLJHA

    Franklin FTSE Japan ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPYCvsFLJHA

    Lazard Japanese Equity ETF · Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FLJPAvsSCJA

    Franklin FTSE Japan ETF · iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPYCvsSCJA

    Lazard Japanese Equity ETF · iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.