FLJP ranks 1st and OPPJ 11th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
FLJP vs OPPJ
FLJP −0.49pt a year
0.09%0.58%
FLJP 20.1×the volume
976K48.6K
OPPJ +15.2pt
+9.2%+24.4%
FLJP vs OPPJ Performance
+55.0%+197.3%
- FLJP 0.09%, better
- OPPJ 0.58%
- FLJP $4.27B
- OPPJ $326M
- FLJP +16.4%
- OPPJ +33.2%, better
- FLJP 4.26%, better
- OPPJ 1.12%
- FLJP 447
- OPPJ 69
- FLJP 976K sh, better
- OPPJ 48.6K sh
- FLJP $39.98
- OPPJ $57.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLJP | OPPJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | C44 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A90 |
| Risk | C48 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A71Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | D29 |
| Durability | B61Higher | B60 |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. FLJP and OPPJ are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLJPA
OPPJB
In short
FLJP Japan's whole market for nine basis points. FLJP tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index across roughly 500 stocks at 0.09%, a fraction of what the typical Japan fund charges.
OPPJ Most Japan funds just hand you the index. OPPJ builds around the reform story: Berkshire's trading-house stakes, buyback-heavy payers, cheap governance improvers, and a yen hedge that resets between 0% and 100% every month.
Stated mandate
FLJP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.
OPPJ The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree Japan Opportunities Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing and generally representative sampling, investing at least 80% of assets in Index constituents or economically similar investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLJP vs OPPJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLJP vs OPPJ Cost
Overpaying OPPJ vs FLJP
$9,555
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLJP 0.09%
$1,898
OPPJ 0.58%
$11,453
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLJP | OPPJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $1,041 | $876 |
| 20 | $646 | $3,986 | $3,340 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $11,453 | $9,555 |
- 0.09%FLJP, cheaper
- 0.58%OPPJ
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJP cheapest of 18 funds
OPPJ 10th cheapest of 18 funds
FLJP vs OPPJ Dividends
- FLJP 4.26%, better
- OPPJ 1.12%
- FLJP $1.69
- OPPJ $0.64
- FLJP $0.17
- OPPJ $0.34
- FLJP Jun 26, 2026
- OPPJ Jun 25, 2026
- FLJP Jul 6, 2026
- OPPJ Jun 29, 2026
- FLJP Twice a year
- OPPJ Quarterly
Distribution history
FLJP vs OPPJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLJP
- OPPJ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLJP 12.5%OPPJ 12.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FLJP 1.17OPPJ 1.72, better
- Worst fall
- FLJP −28.8%OPPJ −16.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLJP 0.96OPPJ 0.56
FLJP and OPPJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

