FLKR ranks 13th and KMCA 38th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
FLKR vs KMCA
FLKR −0.56pt a year
0.09%0.65%
FLKR 140.3×the volume
842K6K
FLKR vs KMCA Performance
−16.4%−23.5%
- FLKR 0.09%, better
- KMCA 0.65%
- FLKR $1.57B
- KMCA $4M
- FLKR +51.8%
- KMCA
- FLKR 3.24%
- KMCA
- FLKR 148
- KMCA 36
- FLKR 842K sh, better
- KMCA 6K sh
- FLKR $45.14
- KMCA $14.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLKR | KMCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F8 |
| Mission | B57 | |
| Risk | D28Higher | F4 |
| Tradability | C49Higher | F6 |
| Holdings | C53Higher | F10 |
| Durability | B60Higher | F5 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. FLKR and KMCA are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLKRB
KMCAF
In short
FLKR Korea in one passive basket for 0.09% a year, a fraction of the 0.50% typical single-country fee. Roughly 160 Korean names tracking a capped FTSE index, run as plain index plumbing rather than a stock-picking bet.
KMCA Korea, minus the index filler. KMCA holds roughly 40 companies in the industries Korea actually dominates: AI chips, batteries, shipyards, defense, power grid and nuclear, robotics. Hanwha's PLUS lineup, wrapped for US buyers.
Stated mandate
FLKR The Fund uses a passive indexing approach to seek returns that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the FTSE South Korea Capped Index.
KMCA The Fund seeks investment results that generally correspond to the performance of an index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLKR vs KMCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLKR vs KMCA Cost
Overpaying KMCA vs FLKR
$10,819
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLKR 0.09%
$1,898
KMCA 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLKR | KMCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $1,163 | $998 |
| 20 | $646 | $4,440 | $3,794 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $12,717 | $10,819 |
- 0.09%FLKR, cheaper
- 0.65%KMCA
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLKR cheapest of 38 funds
KMCA 35th cheapest of 38 funds
FLKR vs KMCA Dividends
- FLKR 3.24%
- KMCA
- FLKR $1.47
- KMCA None
- FLKR $0.30
- KMCA
- FLKR Jun 26, 2026
- KMCA
- FLKR Jul 6, 2026
- KMCA
- FLKR Twice a year
- KMCA
Distribution history
FLKR vs KMCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLKR 43.0%KMCA
- Return per unit of risk
- FLKR 0.97KMCA
- Worst fall
- FLKR −41.3%KMCA
- Market sensitivity
- FLKR 2.57KMCA 0.00
FLKR and KMCA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





