ILCV ranks 2nd and FLQL 18th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FLQL vs ILCV
ILCV −0.11pt a year
0.15%0.04%
FLQL 3.6×the volume
91.8K25.4K
FLQL +0.4pt
+12.6%+12.2%
FLQL vs ILCV Performance
+81.3%+78.1%
- FLQL 0.15%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- FLQL $2.11B
- ILCV $1.37B
- FLQL +10.8%
- ILCV +20.8%, better
- FLQL 1.09%
- ILCV 1.52%, better
- FLQL 221
- ILCV 375
- FLQL 91.8K sh, better
- ILCV 25.4K sh
- FLQL $75.78
- ILCV $109.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLQL | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A87Higher | A82 |
| Risk | C46 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | D35 | C40Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FLQL and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLQLA
ILCVA
In short
FLQL Four factors (quality, value, momentum, low volatility) blended into one US large-cap portfolio for 0.15% a year. Franklin's LibertyQ index has run the blend since 2017, and the fund tracks it closely.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
FLQL The fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, also called the U.S. Large Cap Underlying Index.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLQL vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLQL vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying FLQL vs ILCV
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLQL 0.15%
$3,137
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLQL | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $73 | $201 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $288 | $783 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $849 | $2,288 |
- 0.15%FLQL
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
FLQL 13th cheapest of 99 funds
FLQL vs ILCV Dividends
- FLQL 1.09%
- ILCV 1.52%, better
- FLQL $0.83
- ILCV $1.65
- FLQL $0.19
- ILCV $0.42
- FLQL Sep 18, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- FLQL Sep 25, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- FLQL Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
FLQL vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLQL
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLQL 12.6%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLQL 1.39ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- FLQL −21.4%ILCV −18.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLQL 0.96ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


