VYM ranks 2nd and FLQL 18th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FLQL vs VYM
VYM −0.11pt a year
0.15%0.04%
VYM 12.5×the volume
91.8K1.14M
FLQL +1.2pt
+12.6%+11.4%
FLQL vs VYM Performance
+81.3%+71.4%
- FLQL 0.15%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- FLQL $2.11B
- VYM $78.9B
- FLQL +10.8%
- VYM +19.7%, better
- FLQL 1.09%
- VYM 2.25%, better
- FLQL 221
- VYM 610
- FLQL 91.8K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- FLQL $75.78
- VYM $163.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLQL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A87Higher | A79 |
| Risk | C46 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | D35 | C53Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FLQL and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLQLA
VYMA
In short
FLQL Four factors (quality, value, momentum, low volatility) blended into one US large-cap portfolio for 0.15% a year. Franklin's LibertyQ index has run the blend since 2017, and the fund tracks it closely.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
FLQL The fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, also called the U.S. Large Cap Underlying Index.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLQL vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLQL vs VYM Cost
Overpaying FLQL vs VYM
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLQL 0.15%
$3,137
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLQL | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $73 | $201 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $288 | $783 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $849 | $2,288 |
- 0.15%FLQL
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
FLQL 13th cheapest of 99 funds
FLQL vs VYM Dividends
- FLQL 1.09%
- VYM 2.25%, better
- FLQL $0.83
- VYM $3.68
- FLQL $0.19
- VYM $0.89
- FLQL Sep 18, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- FLQL Sep 25, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- FLQL Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
FLQL vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLQL
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLQL 12.6%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLQL 1.39, betterVYM 1.38
- Worst fall
- FLQL −21.4%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLQL 0.96VYM 0.74
FLQL and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





