VYM ranks 2nd and FLQS 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FLQS vs VYM
VYM −0.31pt a year
0.35%0.04%
VYM 262.1×the volume
4.36K1.14M
VYM +5.8pt
+5.8%+11.6%
FLQS vs VYM Performance
+32.4%+73.0%
- FLQS 0.35%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- FLQS $49M
- VYM $95.8B
- FLQS +18.5%
- VYM +19.4%, better
- FLQS 1.48%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FLQS 492
- VYM 610
- FLQS 4.36K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- FLQS $49.07
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLQS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A85Higher | A79 |
| Risk | C40 | A85Higher |
| Tradability | F22 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C53 |
| Durability | C45 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FLQS and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLQSC
VYMA
In short
FLQS Four screens (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) run across about 500 small U.S. companies. Franklin's LibertyQ recipe, live since 2017: small-cap breadth with a rules-based tilt instead of a plain size index.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
FLQS The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in the index's component securities.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLQS vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLQS vs VYM Cost
Overpaying FLQS vs VYM
$6,277
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLQS 0.35%
$7,126
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLQS | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $73 | $561 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $288 | $2,166 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $849 | $6,277 |
- 0.35%FLQS
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
FLQS 56th cheapest of 99 funds
FLQS vs VYM Dividends
- FLQS 1.48%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FLQS $0.73
- VYM $3.68
- FLQS $0.20
- VYM $0.89
- FLQS Sep 18, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- FLQS Sep 25, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- FLQS Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
FLQS vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLQS
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLQS 17.4%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLQS 0.69VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- FLQS −28.0%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLQS 0.91VYM 0.74
FLQS and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



