FTSL ranks 4th and FLRT 6th of 11 funds in the Bank Loan Category.
FLRT vs FTSL
FLRT −0.10pt a year
0.60%0.70%
FTSL 1.5×the volume
199K292K
FLRT +0.4pt
+4.7%+4.3%
FLRT vs FTSL Performance
+33.9%+28.3%
- FLRT 0.60%, better
- FTSL 0.70%
- FLRT $1.09B
- FTSL $2.49B
- FLRT +4.5%, better
- FTSL +3.3%
- FLRT 6.62%, better
- FTSL 6.28%
- FLRT 370
- FTSL 377
- FLRT 199K sh
- FTSL 292K sh, better
- FLRT $46.24
- FTSL $44.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLRT | FTSL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57Higher | F17 |
| Mission | F23 | B62Higher |
| Risk | B69Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | A80 |
| Holdings | D36 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A71 | A85Higher |
Rank among Bank Loan funds
Same Category. FLRT and FTSL are both graded against the same 11 Bank Loan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLRTC
FTSLC
In short
FLRT A bank-loan specialist parked in a high-yield crowd. FLRT buys floating-rate debt from below-investment-grade borrowers, so coupons reset with short-term rates instead of sitting fixed, and a credit sub-adviser picks the paper. Running since 2015.
FTSL Most funds in the high-yield aisle own fixed-coupon junk bonds. FTSL owns first-lien senior bank loans whose coupons float with short-term rates, chosen by a live credit team instead of an index rulebook, with income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
FLRT The fund seeks high current income by investing mainly in floating-rate loans issued by non-investment-grade companies; this exposure may also help hedge rising interest rates.
FTSL The fund seeks high current income and secondarily aims to preserve capital. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in first-lien senior floating-rate bank loans, primarily to North American businesses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLRT vs FTSL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLRT vs FTSL Cost
Overpaying FTSL vs FLRT
$1,789
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLRT 0.60%
$11,817
FTSL 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLRT | FTSL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,250 | $174 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $4,760 | $644 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $13,606 | $1,789 |
- 0.60%FLRT, cheaper
- 0.70%FTSL
- Middle half of Bank Loan funds
- Median 0.61%
FLRT 5th cheapest of 11 funds
FTSL 9th cheapest of 11 funds
FLRT vs FTSL Dividends
- FLRT 6.62%, better
- FTSL 6.28%
- FLRT $3.06
- FTSL $2.80
- FLRT $0.20
- FTSL $0.23
- FLRT Oct 22, 2026
- FTSL Oct 21, 2026
- FLRT Oct 26, 2026
- FTSL Oct 30, 2026
- FLRT Monthly
- FTSL Monthly
Distribution history
FLRT vs FTSL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLRT
- FTSL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLRT 2.1%FTSL 2.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLRT 1.40, betterFTSL 0.88
- Worst fall
- FLRT −7.6%FTSL −7.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLRT 0.10FTSL 0.06
FLRT and FTSL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.57%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.57%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
