PANG ranks 3rd and FLYT 252nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
FLYT vs PANG
PANG −0.54pt a year
1.30%0.76%
FLYT 4.4×the volume
198K44.6K
FLYT vs PANG Performance
−85.4%+91.6%
- FLYT 1.30%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- FLYT $6M
- PANG $9M
- FLYT −85.4%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- FLYT 2
- PANG 4
- FLYT 198K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- FLYT $3.08
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLYT | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D33 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C54 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C54 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. FLYT and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLYTD
PANGA
In short
FLYT Most single-stock leveraged funds crowd around mega-caps. FLYT aims 2x daily leverage at Firefly Aerospace, a newly public rocket maker, using swaps, options or the shares themselves. It resets every day, so it is built for short holding periods.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
FLYT The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the daily performance of Firefly Aerospace common shares. It targets that result for a single trading day and uses swaps, options, and/or direct stock investment.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLYT vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLYT vs PANG Cost
Overpaying FLYT vs PANG
$8,713
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLYT 1.30%
$23,369
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLYT | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,263 | $1,353 | $910 |
| 20 | $8,393 | $5,142 | $3,251 |
| 30 | $23,369 | $14,656 | $8,713 |
- 1.30%FLYT
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
FLYT 229th cheapest of 315 funds
FLYT vs PANG Dividends
- FLYT None
- PANG
- FLYT
- PANG $1.30
- FLYT
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- FLYT
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- FLYT
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
FLYT vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLYT 173.2%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FLYT −0.16PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- FLYT −95.0%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FLYT 2.05PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.30% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.