WTMF ranks 2nd and FMF 7th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.
FMF vs WTMF
WTMF −0.32pt a year
0.98%0.66%
FMF 1.3×the volume
48.3K36.1K
WTMF +0.8pt
+3.0%+3.8%
FMF vs WTMF Performance
+28.5%+36.6%
- FMF 0.98%
- WTMF 0.66%, better
- FMF $298M
- WTMF $264M
- FMF +12.3%
- WTMF +12.6%, better
- FMF 4.82%
- WTMF 7.95%, better
- FMF 37
- WTMF 27
- FMF 48.3K sh, better
- WTMF 36.1K sh
- FMF $51.36
- WTMF $39.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMF | WTMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F20 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | B55Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A77 | A80Higher |
Rank among Managed Futures funds
Same Category. FMF and WTMF are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMFC
WTMFA
In short
FMF One of the original managed futures ETFs, trading since 2013: long, short or flat across commodity, currency, equity index and Treasury futures, aiming at returns that don't track stocks or bonds.
WTMF A managed futures veteran. Trading since 2011, WTMF takes rules-based long and short positions across commodity, currency, equity and rate futures, aiming for returns with limited direct link to stocks or bonds.
Stated mandate
FMF The Fund seeks positive returns that are not directly correlated with broad equity or fixed-income market returns. It primarily uses exchange-listed futures, including through a wholly owned Cayman Islands subsidiary, and may take long or short positions across global futures markets.
WTMF The Fund seeks positive total returns in rising or falling markets with limited direct correlation to broad equity or fixed-income returns. It uses a quantitative, rules-based approach with long and short futures positions across commodity, currency, equity, and interest-rate markets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMF vs WTMF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMF vs WTMF Cost
Overpaying FMF vs WTMF
$5,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMF 0.98%
$18,362
WTMF 0.66%
$12,896
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMF | WTMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $1,180 | $549 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $4,504 | $2,000 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $12,896 | $5,466 |
- 0.98%FMF
- 0.66%WTMF, cheaper
- Middle half of Managed Futures funds
- Median 0.85%
WTMF 3rd cheapest of 14 funds
FMF 12th cheapest of 14 funds
FMF vs WTMF Dividends
- FMF 4.82%
- WTMF 7.95%, better
- FMF $2.48
- WTMF $3.14
- FMF $0.23
- WTMF $2.81
- FMF Sep 24, 2026
- WTMF Oct 27, 2026
- FMF Sep 30, 2026
- WTMF Oct 29, 2026
- FMF Quarterly
- WTMF Annual
Distribution history
FMF vs WTMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FMF
- WTMF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMF 7.3%WTMF 6.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FMF 0.34WTMF 0.98, better
- Worst fall
- FMF −15.0%WTMF −13.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FMF 0.11WTMF 0.29
FMF and WTMF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




