VCRM ranks 4th and FMUN 11th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
FMUN vs VCRM
FMUN −0.07pt a year
0.05%0.12%
VCRM 38.6×the volume
17.6K679K
FMUN vs VCRM Performance
+0.3%+1.1%
- FMUN 0.05%, better
- VCRM 0.12%
- FMUN $170M
- VCRM $2.2B
- FMUN +0.3%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- FMUN 3.38%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- FMUN 1220
- VCRM 2588
- FMUN 17.6K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- FMUN $48.61
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FMUN | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | A89 |
| Mission | A91 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D39 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | D35 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | A81 |
| Durability | B60 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. FMUN and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FMUNA
VCRMA
In short
FMUN Fidelity's muni index fund runs on its own rules-based benchmark and charges 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical muni fund costs. Roughly 1,200 bonds, monthly payouts, all pointed at income the federal government doesn't tax.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
FMUN The fund seeks high current income that is exempt from federal income tax. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in municipal securities whose interest is federally tax-exempt.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FMUN vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FMUN vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying VCRM vs FMUN
$1,460
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FMUN 0.05%
$1,060
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FMUN | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $220 | $128 |
| 20 | $360 | $859 | $499 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $2,520 | $1,460 |
- 0.05%FMUN, cheaper
- 0.12%VCRM
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
FMUN 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
FMUN vs VCRM Dividends
- FMUN 3.38%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- FMUN $1.65
- VCRM $2.82
- FMUN $0.13
- VCRM $0.21
- FMUN Oct 29, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- FMUN Pays Nov 2, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- FMUN Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
FMUN vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FMUN 6.6%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FMUN −0.05VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- FMUN −7.3%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FMUN 1.03VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.