SCZ ranks 2nd and FNDC 4th of 16 funds in the International Small-Cap Category.
FNDC vs SCZ
FNDC −0.01pt a year
0.39%0.40%
SCZ 14.0×the volume
92.6K1.3M
FNDC +0.2pt
+8.2%+8.0%
FNDC vs SCZ Performance
+44.5%+26.3%
- FNDC 0.39%, better
- SCZ 0.40%
- FNDC $3.04B
- SCZ $12.7B
- FNDC +15.0%, better
- SCZ +12.2%
- FNDC 3.68%, better
- SCZ 3.22%
- FNDC 1582
- SCZ 2039
- FNDC 92.6K sh
- SCZ 1.3M sh, better
- FNDC $49.16
- SCZ $82.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNDC | SCZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A71 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B64 | A85Higher |
Rank among International Small-Cap funds
Same Category. FNDC and SCZ are both graded against the same 16 International Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNDCA
SCZA
In short
FNDC Schwab's contrarian cut of international small caps: instead of letting share price set position size, FNDC weights roughly 1,600 developed-market small companies by fundamental measures of size, which bakes in a value tilt.
SCZ The purist's take on foreign small caps: developed markets only, outside the US and Canada. Trading since 2007, SCZ follows the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, so Japan, Europe and Australia are in and emerging markets stay out.
Stated mandate
FNDC The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index measuring small non-U.S. developed-market companies according to fundamental size and weighting.
SCZ The fund seeks to track an index of small-cap equities from developed markets outside the United States and Canada, providing international diversification and exposure to overseas small-cap stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNDC vs SCZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNDC vs SCZ Cost
Overpaying SCZ vs FNDC
$192
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNDC 0.39%
$7,898
SCZ 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNDC | SCZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $723 | $18 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,793 | $68 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $8,090 | $192 |
- 0.39%FNDC, cheaper
- 0.40%SCZ
- Middle half of International Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.44%
FNDC 4th cheapest of 16 funds
SCZ 6th cheapest of 16 funds
FNDC vs SCZ Dividends
- FNDC 3.68%, better
- SCZ 3.22%
- FNDC $1.80
- SCZ $2.67
- FNDC $0.28
- SCZ $1.17
- FNDC Jun 24, 2026
- SCZ Jun 15, 2026
- FNDC Jun 29, 2026
- SCZ Jun 18, 2026
- FNDC Twice a year
- SCZ Twice a year
Distribution history
FNDC vs SCZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNDC
- SCZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNDC 13.3%, betterSCZ 13.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FNDC 1.14, betterSCZ 1.04
- Worst fall
- FNDC −30.8%, betterSCZ −35.5%
- Market sensitivity
- FNDC 1.04SCZ 1.00
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.