SCZ ranks 2nd and VSS 3rd of 16 funds in the International Small-Cap Category.
SCZ vs VSS
VSS −0.34pt a year
0.40%0.06%
SCZ 5.4×the volume
1.3M243K
SCZ +0.6pt
+8.0%+7.4%
SCZ vs VSS Performance
+26.3%+24.7%
- SCZ 0.40%
- VSS 0.06%, better
- SCZ $12.7B
- VSS $13.9B
- SCZ +12.2%, better
- VSS +7.2%
- SCZ 3.22%, better
- VSS 3.04%
- SCZ 2039
- VSS 5088
- SCZ 1.3M sh, better
- VSS 243K sh
- SCZ $82.65
- VSS $147.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCZ | VSS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B55Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | A76 | A77Higher |
| Durability | A85 | A91Higher |
Rank among International Small-Cap funds
Same Category. SCZ and VSS are both graded against the same 16 International Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCZA
VSSA
In short
SCZ The purist's take on foreign small caps: developed markets only, outside the US and Canada. Trading since 2007, SCZ follows the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, so Japan, Europe and Australia are in and emerging markets stay out.
VSS One ticker for the small companies the rest of the world runs on: roughly 4,800 stocks across developed and emerging markets outside the US, at 0.06% a year. Vanguard has run it since 2009.
Stated mandate
SCZ The fund seeks to track an index of small-cap equities from developed markets outside the United States and Canada, providing international diversification and exposure to overseas small-cap stocks.
VSS Seeks to track the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, providing broad exposure to developed and emerging non-U.S. small-cap equity markets worldwide through passive index sampling.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCZ vs VSS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCZ vs VSS Cost
Overpaying SCZ vs VSS
$6,820
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCZ 0.40%
$8,090
VSS 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCZ | VSS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $110 | $613 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $432 | $2,361 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $1,270 | $6,820 |
- 0.40%SCZ
- 0.06%VSS, cheaper
- Middle half of International Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.44%
VSS cheapest of 16 funds
SCZ 6th cheapest of 16 funds
SCZ vs VSS Dividends
- SCZ 3.22%, better
- VSS 3.04%
- SCZ $2.67
- VSS $4.51
- SCZ $1.17
- VSS $0.30
- SCZ Jun 15, 2026
- VSS Sep 18, 2026
- SCZ Jun 18, 2026
- VSS Sep 22, 2026
- SCZ Twice a year
- VSS Quarterly
Distribution history
SCZ vs VSS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SCZ
- VSS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCZ 13.6%, betterVSS 14.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCZ 1.04, betterVSS 0.88
- Worst fall
- SCZ −35.5%VSS −33.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SCZ 1.00VSS 0.98
SCZ and VSS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
