VEA ranks 2nd and FNDF 14th of 20 funds in the Developed International Core Category.
FNDF vs VEA
VEA −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
VEA 6.1×the volume
1.65M10.1M
FNDF +1.6pt
+11.4%+9.8%
FNDF vs VEA Performance
+90.4%+55.4%
- FNDF 0.25%
- VEA 0.03%, better
- FNDF $25.8B
- VEA $314B
- FNDF +26.7%, better
- VEA +16.9%
- FNDF 3.04%, better
- VEA 2.45%
- FNDF 901
- VEA 3914
- FNDF 1.65M sh
- VEA 10.1M sh, better
- FNDF $53.98
- VEA $69.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNDF | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B64Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | C47 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B68 | A91Higher |
Rank among Developed International Core funds
Same Category. FNDF and VEA are both graded against the same 20 Developed International Core funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNDFB
VEAA
In short
FNDF Most developed-international index funds rank companies by market price. FNDF ranks them by fundamental business size and rebalances back to it, a contrarian, value-leaning route through roughly 900 of the same stocks.
VEA Everything developed outside the US in one line item: roughly 3,900 stocks across Canada, Europe and the Pacific, small caps included. Vanguard has run it since 2007 at three basis points.
Stated mandate
FNDF The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index representing large companies from developed markets outside the United States, weighted according to fundamental size.
VEA Seeks to track the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index through an indexing strategy investing substantially all assets in the index’s large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks across Canada, Europe, and the Pacific region.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNDF vs VEA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNDF vs VEA Cost
Overpaying FNDF vs VEA
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNDF 0.25%
$5,159
VEA 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNDF | VEA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%FNDF
- 0.03%VEA, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Core funds
- Median 0.10%
VEA cheapest of 20 funds
FNDF 15th cheapest of 20 funds
FNDF vs VEA Dividends
- FNDF 3.04%, better
- VEA 2.45%
- FNDF $1.64
- VEA $1.70
- FNDF $0.30
- VEA $0.18
- FNDF Jun 24, 2026
- VEA Sep 18, 2026
- FNDF Jun 29, 2026
- VEA Sep 22, 2026
- FNDF Twice a year
- VEA Quarterly
Distribution history
FNDF vs VEA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNDF
- VEA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNDF 12.4%, betterVEA 12.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FNDF 1.50, betterVEA 1.25
- Worst fall
- FNDF −25.6%, betterVEA −29.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FNDF 0.97VEA 0.97Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
FNDF and VEA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





