VYM ranks 2nd and FNDX 9th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
FNDX vs VYM
VYM −0.21pt a year
0.25%0.04%
FNDX 2.7×the volume
3.03M1.14M
FNDX +2.8pt
+14.8%+12.0%
FNDX vs VYM Performance
+89.7%+74.3%
- FNDX 0.25%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- FNDX $28.5B
- VYM $95.8B
- FNDX +25.0%, better
- VYM +19.3%
- FNDX 1.44%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FNDX 732
- VYM 601
- FNDX 3.03M sh, better
- VYM 1.14M sh
- FNDX $32.71
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FNDX | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A91Higher | A79 |
| Risk | A90Higher | A84 |
| Tradability | A88Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | B62Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A87 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. FNDX and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FNDXA
VYMA
In short
FNDX A large-cap fund that refuses to size positions by stock price. FNDX weights about 700 U.S. companies by fundamental measures of business size, tilting toward value and profitability instead of whatever the market just bid up.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
FNDX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index representing large U.S. companies weighted according to fundamental size measures.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FNDX vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FNDX vs VYM Cost
Overpaying FNDX vs VYM
$4,310
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FNDX 0.25%
$5,159
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FNDX | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $73 | $382 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $288 | $1,481 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $849 | $4,310 |
- 0.25%FNDX
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
FNDX 36th cheapest of 99 funds
FNDX vs VYM Dividends
- FNDX 1.44%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- FNDX $0.47
- VYM $3.68
- FNDX $0.12
- VYM $0.89
- FNDX Sep 23, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- FNDX Sep 28, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- FNDX Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
FNDX vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FNDX
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FNDX 11.5%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FNDX 1.54, betterVYM 1.38
- Worst fall
- FNDX −19.1%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FNDX 0.89VYM 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



