Skip to content

FPAA vs RISN

FPA Global Allocation ETF

FPAACCboe

Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

RISNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FPAA −0.23pt a year

FPAA0.49%RISN0.72%

Avg volume · 30D

FPAA 1.03×the volume

FPAA15.3KRISN14.8K

FPAA vs RISN Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

+0.4%FPAA−2.0%RISN

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. FPAA +0.4%. RISN −2.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−4%−3%−1%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FPAA 0.49%, better
RISN 0.72%
Fund size
FPAA $36M
RISN $68M
1Y total return
FPAA No data
RISN +6.6%
Yield (12M)
FPAA No data
RISN 1.05%
Holdings
FPAA 5
RISN 52
Avg volume (30D)
FPAA 15.3K sh, better
RISN 14.8K sh
NAV per share
FPAA $25.87
RISN $30.17
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FPAA: Cost 90, Risk 82, Mission 10, Tradability 48, Holdings 32, Durability 30. RISN: Cost 76, Risk 49, Mission 84, Tradability 65, Holdings 79, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for FPAA, RISN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFPAARISN
Cost30% weightA90HigherA76
Mission25% weightF10A84Higher
Risk15% weightA82HigherC49
Tradability15% weightC48B65Higher
Holdings10% weightD32A79Higher
Durability5% weightD30B68Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FPAA and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

RISN ranks 2nd and FPAA 24th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3APBLPGIM Portfolio Ballast ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 24CCLSMETC Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 24CFPAAFPA Global Allocation ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 24CGMMAGammaRoad Market Navigation ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FPAACFPA Global Allocation ETF

RISNAInspire Capital Appreciation ETF

In short

FPAA No data

RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.

Stated mandate

FPAA No data

RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.

Why people hold it

FPAA No data

  • RISN Charges 0.72% a year, under the going rate for tactical multi-asset funds that actively shift their mix.
  • One ticket holds U.S. large-cap equities alongside U.S. fixed income, with the stated aim of long-term appreciation at lower volatility than U.S. large caps.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded tactical multi-asset field, with a live record going back to its 2020 launch.
  • Pays out quarterly, so the bond sleeve shows up as scheduled cash rather than a once-a-year surprise.

Worth knowing

FPAA No data

  • RISN Thinly traded and modest in size, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than the fee does. Limit orders are the standard workaround.
  • Tactical means judgment calls: the allocation can look nothing like a fixed stock/bond blend at any given moment.
  • Cheap for tactical, not cheap outright. Peers such as ENDW (0.22%) and ONOF (0.39%) run at a fraction of the fee.

Full FPAA profile⁠

Full RISN profile⁠

FPAA vs RISN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FPAA vs RISN Cost

Overpaying RISN vs FPAA

$4,165

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FPAA 0.49%

    $9,792

  • RISN 0.72%

    $13,957

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FPAA 0.49%
  • RISN 0.72%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530RISN $13,957FPAA $9,792

Year by year

YearFPAARISNOverpaying
10$883$1,284$401
20$3,394$4,888$1,494
30$9,792$13,957$4,165

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%FPAA, cheaper
  • 0.72%RISN
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

FPAA 5th cheapest of 46 funds

RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds

FPAA vs RISN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FPAA No data
RISN 1.05%
Payout (12M)
FPAA No data
RISN $0.32
Last payment
FPAA $0.13
RISN $0.08
Ex-dividend
FPAA Sep 25, 2026
RISN Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
FPAA Sep 29, 2026
RISN Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
FPAA Irregular
RISN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

FPAAIrregular · 1 paymentAll FPAA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD
RISNQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll RISN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 25, 2020 $0.03; Dec 14, 2020 $1.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.01; Mar 26, 2021 $0.03; Jun 25, 2021 $0.05; Sep 24, 2021 $0.05; Dec 14, 2021 $2.65; Sep 23, 2022 $0.06; Dec 14, 2022 $0.23; Mar 27, 2023 $0.13; Jun 23, 2023 $0.15; Sep 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 14, 2023 $0.13; Mar 27, 2024 $0.08; Jun 25, 2024 $0.06; Sep 25, 2024 $0.10; Dec 16, 2024 $0.13; Mar 27, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.06; Sep 26, 2025 $0.12; Dec 17, 2025 $0.07; Mar 27, 2026 $0.07; Jun 26, 2026 $0.10; Sep 25, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.50202020232026YTD

FPAA vs RISN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FPAA No dataRISN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FPAA No dataRISN 0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FPAA No dataRISN −21.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FPAA 0.93RISN 1.08

Popular comparisons

  • FPAACvsENDWA

    FPA Global Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsENDWA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FPAACvsPBLA

    FPA Global Allocation ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPBLA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FPAACvsPTBDA

    FPA Global Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RISNAvsPTBDA

    Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.72% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.