PTBD ranks 3rd and RISN 4th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
PTBD vs RISN
PTBD −0.12pt a year
0.60%0.72%
PTBD 1.3×the volume
18.6K14.8K
RISN +5.0pt
−1.6%+3.4%
PTBD vs RISN Performance
−7.9%+18.4%
- PTBD 0.60%, better
- RISN 0.72%
- PTBD $83M
- RISN $70M
- PTBD −0.1%
- RISN +4.8%, better
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- RISN 1.05%
- PTBD 1047
- RISN 53
- PTBD 18.6K sh, better
- RISN 14.8K sh
- PTBD $18.34
- RISN $31.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PTBD | RISN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | A76 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B60Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | C50 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A90Higher | A80 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B68 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. PTBD and RISN are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PTBDA
RISNA
In short
PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.
RISN A tactical blend of U.S. large-cap stocks and U.S. bonds from a values-screening shop, built to chase long-term growth with less turbulence than the large-cap market, at a fee below the typical tactical peer.
Stated mandate
PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.
RISN The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation with lower volatility than the U.S. large-cap stock market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PTBD vs RISN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PTBD vs RISN Cost
Overpaying RISN vs PTBD
$2,140
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PTBD 0.60%
$11,817
RISN 0.72%
$13,957
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PTBD | RISN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,284 | $208 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $4,888 | $772 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $13,957 | $2,140 |
- 0.60%PTBD, cheaper
- 0.72%RISN
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds
RISN 12th cheapest of 46 funds
PTBD vs RISN Dividends
- PTBD 6.36%, better
- RISN 1.05%
- PTBD $1.17
- RISN $0.32
- PTBD $0.10
- RISN $0.08
- PTBD Oct 22, 2026
- RISN Sep 25, 2026
- PTBD Oct 26, 2026
- RISN Oct 1, 2026
- PTBD Monthly
- RISN Quarterly
Distribution history
PTBD vs RISN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PTBD
- RISN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PTBD 5.2%, betterRISN 11.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- PTBD 0.08RISN 0.77, better
- Worst fall
- PTBD −24.8%RISN −21.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PTBD 0.74RISN 1.08
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.