FQAL ranks 3rd and QOWZ 17th of 26 funds in the US Quality Index Category.
FQAL vs QOWZ
FQAL −0.24pt a year
0.15%0.39%
FQAL 32.1×the volume
58.6K1.83K
FQAL vs QOWZ Performance
+12.2%+1.6%
- FQAL 0.15%, better
- QOWZ 0.39%
- FQAL $1.41B
- QOWZ $10M
- FQAL +12.2%, better
- QOWZ +1.6%
- FQAL 1.16%, better
- QOWZ 0.24%
- FQAL 138
- QOWZ 53
- FQAL 58.6K sh, better
- QOWZ 1.83K sh
- FQAL $83.39
- QOWZ $36.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FQAL | QOWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | C44 |
| Mission | A89Higher | A81 |
| Risk | A70Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | C54Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | C52Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A76Higher | C40 |
Rank among US Quality Index funds
Same Category. FQAL and QOWZ are both graded against the same 26 US Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FQALA
QOWZC
In short
FQAL Fidelity's own quality screen, boxed into an ETF: roughly 130 U.S. companies picked for profitability, steady cash flow and clean balance sheets, at 0.15% a year, well under the typical fee in the quality-factor group.
QOWZ Most growth funds rank stocks by how fast sales climb. QOWZ starts with cash, tracking a Nasdaq index that picks roughly 50 US companies on the free cash flow they actually generate. A quality filter wearing a growth label.
Stated mandate
FQAL The fund prioritizes U.S. companies exhibiting higher profitability, stable cash flows, and strong balance sheets.
QOWZ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index. It invests at least 90% of total assets in securities comprising that Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FQAL vs QOWZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FQAL vs QOWZ Cost
Overpaying QOWZ vs FQAL
$4,761
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FQAL 0.15%
$3,137
QOWZ 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FQAL | QOWZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $705 | $431 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,725 | $1,654 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $7,898 | $4,761 |
- 0.15%FQAL, cheaper
- 0.39%QOWZ
- Middle half of US Quality Index funds
- Median 0.39%
FQAL 3rd cheapest of 26 funds
QOWZ 14th cheapest of 26 funds
FQAL vs QOWZ Dividends
- FQAL 1.16%, better
- QOWZ 0.24%
- FQAL $0.97
- QOWZ $0.09
- FQAL $0.24
- QOWZ $0.02
- FQAL Sep 18, 2026
- QOWZ Sep 21, 2026
- FQAL Sep 22, 2026
- QOWZ Sep 25, 2026
- FQAL Quarterly
- QOWZ Quarterly
Distribution history
FQAL vs QOWZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FQAL 11.0%QOWZ 14.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FQAL 1.45QOWZ 0.73
- Worst fall
- FQAL −25.5%QOWZ −20.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FQAL 0.95QOWZ 1.02
FQAL and QOWZ in the news
Category Review
Cash-flow quality returned 42% while QUAL returned 17%

Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.