FQAL ranks 3rd and SQLT 10th of 26 funds in the US Quality Index Category.
FQAL vs SQLT
FQAL −0.05pt a year
0.15%0.20%
FQAL 225.4×the volume
58.6K260
FQAL vs SQLT Performance
+1.7%−1.2%
- FQAL 0.15%, better
- SQLT 0.20%
- FQAL $1.41B
- SQLT $7M
- FQAL +12.2%
- SQLT
- FQAL 1.16%
- SQLT
- FQAL 138
- SQLT 488
- FQAL 58.6K sh, better
- SQLT 260 sh
- FQAL $83.39
- SQLT $28.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FQAL | SQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A89 | |
| Risk | A70 | A81Higher |
| Tradability | C54Higher | F7 |
| Holdings | C52 | A92Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | D33 |
Rank among US Quality Index funds
Same Category. FQAL and SQLT are both graded against the same 26 US Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FQALA
SQLTB
In short
FQAL Fidelity's own quality screen, boxed into an ETF: roughly 130 U.S. companies picked for profitability, steady cash flow and clean balance sheets, at 0.15% a year, well under the typical fee in the quality-factor group.
Stated mandate
FQAL The fund prioritizes U.S. companies exhibiting higher profitability, stable cash flows, and strong balance sheets.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FQAL vs SQLT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FQAL vs SQLT Cost
Overpaying SQLT vs FQAL
$1,018
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FQAL 0.15%
$3,137
SQLT 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FQAL | SQLT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $365 | $91 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,421 | $350 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $4,155 | $1,018 |
- 0.15%FQAL, cheaper
- 0.20%SQLT
- Middle half of US Quality Index funds
- Median 0.39%
FQAL 3rd cheapest of 26 funds
SQLT 8th cheapest of 26 funds
FQAL vs SQLT Dividends
- FQAL 1.16%
- SQLT
- FQAL $0.97
- SQLT
- FQAL $0.24
- SQLT $0.08
- FQAL Sep 18, 2026
- SQLT Sep 15, 2026
- FQAL Sep 22, 2026
- SQLT Sep 18, 2026
- FQAL Quarterly
- SQLT Quarterly
Distribution history
FQAL vs SQLT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FQAL 11.0%SQLT
- Return per unit of risk
- FQAL 1.45SQLT
- Worst fall
- FQAL −25.5%SQLT
- Market sensitivity
- FQAL 0.95SQLT −0.34
FQAL and SQLT in the news
Category Review
Cash-flow quality returned 42% while QUAL returned 17%

Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.