Skip to content

FQAL vs XSHQ

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF

FQALANYSE Arca

Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF

XSHQBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

FQAL −0.14pt a year

FQAL0.15%XSHQ0.29%

Avg volume · 30D

FQAL 1.7×the volume

FQAL58.6KXSHQ34.3K

5Y return · a year

FQAL +5.2pt

FQAL+10.9%XSHQ+5.7%

FQAL vs XSHQ Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+67.7%FQAL+32.0%XSHQ

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FQAL +67.7%. XSHQ +32.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FQAL 0.15%, better
XSHQ 0.29%
Fund size
FQAL $1.41B
XSHQ $296M
1Y total return
FQAL +12.2%
XSHQ +13.6%, better
Yield (12M)
FQAL 1.16%
XSHQ 1.19%, better
Holdings
FQAL 138
XSHQ 117
Avg volume (30D)
FQAL 58.6K sh, better
XSHQ 34.3K sh
NAV per share
FQAL $83.39
XSHQ $46.37
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FQAL: Cost 84, Risk 70, Mission 89, Tradability 54, Holdings 52, Durability 76. XSHQ: Cost 56, Risk 26, Mission 66, Tradability 51, Holdings 73, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for FQAL, XSHQ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFQALXSHQ
Cost30% weightA84HigherB56
Mission25% weightA89HigherB66
Risk15% weightA70HigherD26
Tradability15% weightC54HigherC51
Holdings10% weightC52A73Higher
Durability5% weightA76HigherB61

Rank among US Quality Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FQAL and XSHQ are both graded against the same 26 US Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Quality Index⁠

Category · 26 funds
See all 26 ›

FQAL ranks 3rd and XSHQ 11th of 26 funds in the US Quality Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AJQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 1AQUALiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3AFQALFidelity Quality Factor ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4ASPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 11BFLOWGlobal X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 11BXSHQInvesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETFScore 55
  7. Rank 15BVUSEVident U.S. Equity Strategy ETFScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FQALAFidelity Quality Factor ETF

XSHQBInvesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF

In short

FQAL Fidelity's own quality screen, boxed into an ETF: roughly 130 U.S. companies picked for profitability, steady cash flow and clean balance sheets, at 0.15% a year, well under the typical fee in the quality-factor group.

XSHQ Most quality ETFs shop the S&P 500. XSHQ works the small-cap aisle: start with an index that already requires positive earnings, then keep the roughly 120 names scoring best on profits, accruals and leverage.

Stated mandate

FQAL The fund prioritizes U.S. companies exhibiting higher profitability, stable cash flows, and strong balance sheets.

XSHQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index.

Why people hold it

  • FQAL Costs 0.15% a year, roughly half the typical fee among quality-factor ETFs. That puts it in the cheapest tier of the group, alongside JQUA, VFQY and QUAL.
  • The rulebook is Fidelity's own: the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, tracked tightly. One of the closer index implementations in its peer group.
  • Live since 2016 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so this is a settled product rather than a launch still finding its footing.
  • The screen is explicit about what it wants: higher profitability, stable cash flows, strong balance sheets. No vague 'quality' hand-waving.
  • XSHQ Quality is a formula, not a vibe: names ranked on return on equity, accruals ratio and financial leverage, weighted by score times market cap, reset each June and December.invesco.comspglobal.com
  • The starting pool is already picky: S&P 600 membership requires positive earnings in the latest quarter and across the trailing four, so chronic money-losers never reach the screen.sec.gov
  • Live since 2017, and no other fund in its quality-factor peer group tracks this index. It is the small-cap specialist in a lineup built around blue chips.
  • Holdings line up closely with what the label promises, and the fund sits in the upper half of its quality-factor peer group. It pays quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • FQAL Roughly 130 stocks, not the whole market. A narrower bench means individual names and sector tilts carry more weight than in a total-market fund.
  • Trading volume is light next to the category's biggest quality funds, which can show up as wider bid-ask spreads.
  • Distributions come quarterly, but the screen hunts profitability and balance-sheet strength, not yield.
  • XSHQ At 0.29% it runs about double the big large-cap quality funds (JQUA 0.12%, QUAL 0.15%), though that is right at the median for the wider quality group.
  • Trades thinly next to the large-cap quality names, so spreads can widen at the open and close.
  • Small caps swing harder than blue chips, and the screen narrows to about 120 names, so one company's stumble carries more weight.

Full FQAL profile⁠

Full XSHQ profile⁠

FQAL vs XSHQ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FQAL vs XSHQ Cost

Overpaying XSHQ vs FQAL

$2,815

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FQAL 0.15%

    $3,137

  • XSHQ 0.29%

    $5,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FQAL 0.15%
  • XSHQ 0.29%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530XSHQ $5,952FQAL $3,137

Year by year

YearFQALXSHQOverpaying
10$274$527$253
20$1,071$2,044$973
30$3,137$5,952$2,815

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%FQAL, cheaper
  • 0.29%XSHQ
  • Middle half of US Quality Index funds
  • Median 0.39%

FQAL 3rd cheapest of 26 funds

XSHQ 12th cheapest of 26 funds

FQAL vs XSHQ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FQAL 1.16%
XSHQ 1.19%, better
Payout (12M)
FQAL $0.97
XSHQ $0.55
Last payment
FQAL $0.24
XSHQ $0.12
Ex-dividend
FQAL Sep 18, 2026
XSHQ Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
FQAL Sep 22, 2026
XSHQ Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
FQAL Quarterly
XSHQ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FQALQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FQAL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.08; Jun 16, 2017 $0.13; Sep 15, 2017 $0.15; Dec 15, 2017 $0.12; Mar 16, 2018 $0.13; Jun 15, 2018 $0.15; Sep 21, 2018 $0.11; Dec 21, 2018 $0.13; Mar 15, 2019 $0.14; Jun 21, 2019 $0.15; Sep 20, 2019 $0.15; Dec 20, 2019 $0.14; Mar 20, 2020 $0.17; Jun 19, 2020 $0.15; Sep 18, 2020 $0.15; Dec 18, 2020 $0.16; Mar 19, 2021 $0.17; Jun 18, 2021 $0.15; Sep 17, 2021 $0.19; Dec 17, 2021 $0.15; Mar 18, 2022 $0.18; Jun 17, 2022 $0.18; Sep 16, 2022 $0.18; Dec 16, 2022 $0.13; Mar 17, 2023 $0.20; Jun 16, 2023 $0.18; Sep 15, 2023 $0.18; Dec 15, 2023 $0.18; Mar 15, 2024 $0.16; Jun 21, 2024 $0.18; Sep 20, 2024 $0.20; Dec 20, 2024 $0.24; Mar 21, 2025 $0.20; Jun 20, 2025 $0.21; Sep 19, 2025 $0.22; Dec 19, 2025 $0.22; Mar 20, 2026 $0.26; Jun 18, 2026 $0.25; Sep 18, 2026 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
XSHQQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XSHQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.05; Sep 18, 2017 $0.05; Dec 18, 2017 $0.12; Mar 19, 2018 $0.06; Jun 18, 2018 $0.04; Sep 24, 2018 $0.07; Dec 24, 2018 $0.12; Dec 26, 2018 $0.0049; Mar 18, 2019 $0.06; Jun 24, 2019 $0.09; Sep 23, 2019 $0.03; Dec 23, 2019 $0.13; Mar 23, 2020 $0.13; Jun 22, 2020 $0.06; Sep 21, 2020 $0.12; Dec 21, 2020 $0.09; Mar 22, 2021 $0.06; Jun 21, 2021 $0.07; Sep 20, 2021 $0.12; Dec 20, 2021 $0.25; Mar 21, 2022 $0.16; Jun 21, 2022 $0.17; Sep 19, 2022 $0.12; Dec 19, 2022 $0.21; Mar 20, 2023 $0.12; Jun 20, 2023 $0.13; Sep 18, 2023 $0.11; Dec 18, 2023 $0.11; Mar 18, 2024 $0.12; Jun 24, 2024 $0.10; Sep 23, 2024 $0.15; Dec 23, 2024 $0.13; Mar 24, 2025 $0.15; Jun 23, 2025 $0.10; Sep 22, 2025 $0.14; Dec 22, 2025 $0.24; Mar 23, 2026 $0.16; Jun 22, 2026 $0.03; Sep 21, 2026 $0.12. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FQAL vs XSHQ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FQAL
  • XSHQ
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XSHQ −27.4% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FQAL 11.0%, betterXSHQ 17.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FQAL 1.45, betterXSHQ 0.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FQAL −25.5%, betterXSHQ −27.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FQAL 0.95XSHQ 0.95Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

FQAL and XSHQ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FQALAvsJQUAA

    Fidelity Quality Factor ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSHQBvsJQUAA

    Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FQALAvsQUALA

    Fidelity Quality Factor ETF · iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSHQBvsQUALA

    Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF · iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FQALAvsSPHQA

    Fidelity Quality Factor ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XSHQBvsSPHQA

    Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.