FQAL ranks 3rd and XSHQ 11th of 26 funds in the US Quality Index Category.
FQAL vs XSHQ
FQAL −0.14pt a year
0.15%0.29%
FQAL 1.7×the volume
58.6K34.3K
FQAL +5.2pt
+10.9%+5.7%
FQAL vs XSHQ Performance
+67.7%+32.0%
- FQAL 0.15%, better
- XSHQ 0.29%
- FQAL $1.41B
- XSHQ $296M
- FQAL +12.2%
- XSHQ +13.6%, better
- FQAL 1.16%
- XSHQ 1.19%, better
- FQAL 138
- XSHQ 117
- FQAL 58.6K sh, better
- XSHQ 34.3K sh
- FQAL $83.39
- XSHQ $46.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FQAL | XSHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | B56 |
| Mission | A89Higher | B66 |
| Risk | A70Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | C54Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | C52 | A73Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | B61 |
Rank among US Quality Index funds
Same Category. FQAL and XSHQ are both graded against the same 26 US Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FQALA
XSHQB
In short
FQAL Fidelity's own quality screen, boxed into an ETF: roughly 130 U.S. companies picked for profitability, steady cash flow and clean balance sheets, at 0.15% a year, well under the typical fee in the quality-factor group.
XSHQ Most quality ETFs shop the S&P 500. XSHQ works the small-cap aisle: start with an index that already requires positive earnings, then keep the roughly 120 names scoring best on profits, accruals and leverage.
Stated mandate
FQAL The fund prioritizes U.S. companies exhibiting higher profitability, stable cash flows, and strong balance sheets.
XSHQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FQAL vs XSHQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FQAL vs XSHQ Cost
Overpaying XSHQ vs FQAL
$2,815
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FQAL 0.15%
$3,137
XSHQ 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FQAL | XSHQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $527 | $253 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,044 | $973 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $5,952 | $2,815 |
- 0.15%FQAL, cheaper
- 0.29%XSHQ
- Middle half of US Quality Index funds
- Median 0.39%
FQAL 3rd cheapest of 26 funds
XSHQ 12th cheapest of 26 funds
FQAL vs XSHQ Dividends
- FQAL 1.16%
- XSHQ 1.19%, better
- FQAL $0.97
- XSHQ $0.55
- FQAL $0.24
- XSHQ $0.12
- FQAL Sep 18, 2026
- XSHQ Sep 21, 2026
- FQAL Sep 22, 2026
- XSHQ Sep 25, 2026
- FQAL Quarterly
- XSHQ Quarterly
Distribution history
FQAL vs XSHQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FQAL
- XSHQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FQAL 11.0%, betterXSHQ 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FQAL 1.45, betterXSHQ 0.50
- Worst fall
- FQAL −25.5%, betterXSHQ −27.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FQAL 0.95XSHQ 0.95Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
FQAL and XSHQ in the news
Category Review
Cash-flow quality returned 42% while QUAL returned 17%

Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.