JIRE ranks 3rd and FRGN 42nd of 55 funds in the International Active Equity Category.
FRGN vs JIRE
JIRE −0.46pt a year
0.75%0.29%
JIRE 7.3×the volume
55.8K409K
FRGN vs JIRE Performance
+14.8%+8.1%
- FRGN 0.75%
- JIRE 0.29%, better
- FRGN $163M
- JIRE $11.2B
- FRGN
- JIRE +12.3%
- FRGN
- JIRE 2.77%
- FRGN 288
- JIRE 216
- FRGN 55.8K sh
- JIRE 409K sh, better
- FRGN $30.26
- JIRE $83.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FRGN | JIRE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A94Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | A70 | |
| Durability | C50 | A93Higher |
Rank among International Active Equity funds
Same Category. FRGN and JIRE are both graded against the same 55 International Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FRGND
JIREA
In short
FRGN One ticker for developed and emerging markets, steered by quant models instead of an index, with put spreads layered on top. Horizon's international entry launched in December 2025, so the record is still being written.
JIRE EAFE core with a stock-picker's fingerprints. JIRE holds sector and geographic risk close to the MSCI EAFE Index and expresses J.P. Morgan's global analyst calls as small over- and underweights, for 0.29% a year, below the typical active international fee.
Stated mandate
FRGN The fund seeks capital appreciation through active management and quantitative models allocating across developed and emerging markets. It also uses put spreads tactically to enhance total-return potential.
JIRE JIRE seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in foreign developed-market companies. It uses global fundamental research and seeks to outperform the MSCI EAFE Index while maintaining similar sector and geographic risk characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FRGN vs JIRE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FRGN vs JIRE Cost
Overpaying FRGN vs JIRE
$8,530
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FRGN 0.75%
$14,482
JIRE 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FRGN | JIRE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $527 | $809 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $2,044 | $3,034 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $5,952 | $8,530 |
- 0.75%FRGN
- 0.29%JIRE, cheaper
- Middle half of International Active Equity funds
- Median 0.55%
JIRE 5th cheapest of 55 funds
FRGN 41st cheapest of 55 funds
FRGN vs JIRE Dividends
- FRGN
- JIRE 2.77%
- FRGN
- JIRE $2.24
- FRGN $0.06
- JIRE $2.24
- FRGN Dec 24, 2025
- JIRE Dec 16, 2025
- FRGN Dec 26, 2025
- JIRE Dec 18, 2025
- FRGN Irregular
- JIRE Annual
Distribution history
FRGN vs JIRE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FRGN JIRE 11.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FRGN JIRE 1.15
- Worst fall
- FRGN JIRE −16.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FRGN 1.14JIRE 0.81
FRGN and JIRE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




