Skip to content

FSEP vs ZALT

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September

FSEPCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.16pt a year

FSEP0.85%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 2.8×the volume

FSEP49.9KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

FSEP +4.9pt

FSEP+14.9%ZALT+10.0%

FSEP vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+11.1%FSEP+6.9%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. FSEP +11.1%. ZALT +6.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FSEP 0.85%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
FSEP $1.43B
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
FSEP +11.1%, better
ZALT +6.9%
Holdings
FSEP 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
FSEP 49.9K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
FSEP $56.90
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FSEP: Cost 11, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 89, Holdings 54, Durability 83. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for FSEP, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFSEPZALT
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightC52A79Higher
Tradability15% weightA89HigherB65
Holdings10% weightC54A90Higher
Durability5% weightA83HigherB61

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FSEP and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and FSEP 48th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 48CFJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - JulyScore 45
  4. Rank 48CFSEPFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 45
  5. Rank 48CXBFRInnovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FSEPCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

FSEP The September rung of First Trust's twelve-month buffer ladder. It follows the price return of State Street's S&P 500 ETF, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and trades away upside above a cap that resets every September.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

FSEP The fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 14.00% upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses during the stated outcome period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • FSEP The cushion is written into the mandate, not left to a manager's judgment: across each one-year period the options package absorbs the first 10% of a decline in the reference S&P 500 ETF, before fees.
  • Twelve sibling funds, one per calendar month, all at the same 0.85% fee. Pick a start month or stack several so your protection isn't tied to a single September date.
  • Running since 2020 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund with moderate trading activity, so the September vintage is a well-used rung rather than a thin experiment.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • FSEP At 0.85% a year it prices above the typical buffer fund, and cheaper paths to a 10% buffer exist (BUFB at 0.10%, ZALT at 0.69%).
  • Built to be held from one September reset to the next. Buy mid-period and your effective cap and leftover cushion differ from the stated terms.
  • No distributions, so the payoff arrives in the share price. And the cushion stops at 10%; declines past that land on you alongside the reference ETF.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full FSEP profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

FSEP vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FSEP vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying FSEP vs ZALT

$2,770

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FSEP 0.85%

    $16,199

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FSEP 0.85%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FSEP $16,199ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearFSEPZALTOverpaying
10$1,508$1,232$276
20$5,706$4,697$1,009
30$16,199$13,429$2,770

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%FSEP
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

FSEP 60th cheapest of 77 funds

FSEP vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
FSEP None
ZALT None

Distribution history

FSEPAll FSEP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FSEP vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FSEP 7.5%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FSEP 1.43ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FSEP −13.8%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FSEP 0.62ZALT 0.29

FSEP and ZALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FSEPCvsAUGPB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FSEPCvsTENJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FSEPCvsSIXJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.