ZALT ranks 1st and FSEP 48th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
FSEP vs ZALT
ZALT −0.16pt a year
0.85%0.69%
ZALT 2.8×the volume
49.9K138K
FSEP +4.9pt
+14.9%+10.0%
FSEP vs ZALT Performance
+11.1%+6.9%
- FSEP 0.85%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- FSEP $1.43B
- ZALT $840M
- FSEP +11.1%, better
- ZALT +6.9%
- FSEP 3
- ZALT 503
- FSEP 49.9K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- FSEP $56.90
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSEP | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | C52 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | C54 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | B61 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. FSEP and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSEPC
ZALTA
In short
FSEP The September rung of First Trust's twelve-month buffer ladder. It follows the price return of State Street's S&P 500 ETF, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and trades away upside above a cap that resets every September.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
FSEP The fund seeks to track the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to a 14.00% upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses during the stated outcome period.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSEP vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSEP vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying FSEP vs ZALT
$2,770
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSEP 0.85%
$16,199
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSEP | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,232 | $276 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $4,697 | $1,009 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $13,429 | $2,770 |
- 0.85%FSEP
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
FSEP 60th cheapest of 77 funds
FSEP vs ZALT Dividends
- FSEP None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
FSEP vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSEP 7.5%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FSEP 1.43ZALT 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- FSEP −13.8%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FSEP 0.62ZALT 0.29
FSEP and ZALT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
