SUB ranks 2nd and FSMB 24th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
FSMB vs SUB
SUB −0.48pt a year
0.55%0.07%
SUB 4.3×the volume
198K860K
SUB +0.1pt
+1.5%+1.6%
FSMB vs SUB Performance
+7.8%+8.3%
- FSMB 0.55%
- SUB 0.07%, better
- FSMB $660M
- SUB $13.3B
- FSMB +1.8%
- SUB +2.1%, better
- FSMB 3.22%, better
- SUB 2.57%
- FSMB 581
- SUB 3188
- FSMB 198K sh
- SUB 860K sh, better
- FSMB $19.77
- SUB $105.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FSMB | SUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | A79 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A94Higher |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. FSMB and SUB are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FSMBC
SUBA
In short
FSMB Most short-duration muni ETFs are plain index trackers. FSMB is run by hand, and its prospectus lets up to 35% of net assets sit in below-investment-grade munis. Federally tax-exempt income, paid monthly, at a 0.55% fee.
SUB Munis, but only the near end of the curve. Since 2008 SUB has tracked an AMT-free index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing inside five years, paying tax-exempt income monthly with far less rate sensitivity than long-dated muni funds.
Stated mandate
FSMB The fund seeks federally tax-exempt income while emphasizing capital preservation.
SUB The fund seeks to track an index of short-term, investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds maturing from one month through five years, providing tax-exempt income while managing interest-rate risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FSMB vs SUB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FSMB vs SUB Cost
Overpaying FSMB vs SUB
$9,424
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FSMB 0.55%
$10,904
SUB 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FSMB | SUB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $128 | $860 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $503 | $3,287 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $1,480 | $9,424 |
- 0.55%FSMB
- 0.07%SUB, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
SUB 3rd cheapest of 27 funds
FSMB 27th cheapest of 27 funds
FSMB vs SUB Dividends
- FSMB 3.22%, better
- SUB 2.57%
- FSMB $0.64
- SUB $2.73
- FSMB $0.05
- SUB $0.23
- FSMB Oct 21, 2026
- SUB Oct 1, 2026
- FSMB Oct 30, 2026
- SUB Oct 6, 2026
- FSMB Monthly
- SUB Monthly
Distribution history
FSMB vs SUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FSMB
- SUB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FSMB 2.5%SUB 2.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FSMB −0.27, betterSUB −0.59
- Worst fall
- FSMB −5.9%SUB −4.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FSMB 0.34SUB 0.26
FSMB and SUB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

