MUB ranks 3rd and FTCA 41st of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
FTCA vs MUB
MUB −0.30pt a year
0.35%0.05%
MUB 13.7×the volume
703K9.65M
FTCA vs MUB Performance
+1.1%+1.1%
- FTCA 0.35%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- FTCA $769M
- MUB $55B
- FTCA +1.1%
- MUB +1.1%
- FTCA
- MUB 3.26%
- FTCA 333
- MUB 7990
- FTCA 703K sh
- MUB 9.65M sh, better
- FTCA $7.13
- MUB $104.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTCA | MUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A86 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C49 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | D31 | A82Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A93Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. FTCA and MUB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTCAC
MUBA
In short
FTCA Roots back to 1983 and one job since: California muni income the fund seeks to keep exempt from both the federal and the state tax bill. About 300 investment-grade bonds, maturities of three years and up.
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
Stated mandate
FTCA The fund seeks high current income exempt from federal and California personal income taxes while preserving capital. It primarily invests in investment-grade municipal bonds with maturities of at least three years.
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTCA vs MUB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTCA vs MUB Cost
Overpaying FTCA vs MUB
$6,066
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTCA 0.35%
$7,126
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTCA | MUB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $92 | $542 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $360 | $2,094 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,060 | $6,066 |
- 0.35%FTCA
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
FTCA 37th cheapest of 63 funds
FTCA vs MUB Dividends
- FTCA
- MUB 3.26%
- FTCA
- MUB $3.42
- FTCA $0.02
- MUB $0.28
- FTCA Nov 2, 2026
- MUB Nov 2, 2026
- FTCA Nov 5, 2026
- MUB Nov 5, 2026
- FTCA Monthly
- MUB Monthly
Distribution history
FTCA vs MUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTCA 7.4%MUB 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTCA −0.49MUB −0.03
- Worst fall
- FTCA −8.1%MUB −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FTCA 0.15MUB 0.90
FTCA and MUB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





