SPYG ranks 1st and FTGS 28th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
FTGS vs SPYG
SPYG −0.56pt a year
0.60%0.04%
SPYG 19.8×the volume
115K2.28M
SPYG +9.3pt
+17.8%+27.1%
FTGS vs SPYG Performance
+5.2%+8.3%
- FTGS 0.60%
- SPYG 0.04%, better
- FTGS $1.27B
- SPYG $55.5B
- FTGS +5.2%
- SPYG +8.3%, better
- FTGS 0.04%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- FTGS 51
- SPYG 154
- FTGS 115K sh
- SPYG 2.28M sh, better
- FTGS $37.48
- SPYG $119.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTGS | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A98Higher |
| Risk | A70Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | D39 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | D38 |
| Durability | D38 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. FTGS and SPYG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTGSC
SPYGA
In short
FTGS Growth with a credit check. FTGS holds about 50 US names that clear screens for return on equity, long-term debt against cash, and revenue and cash flow growth. Growth that funds itself, rather than borrows for it.
SPYG The growth half of the S&P 500 for 0.04% a year, running since 2000. No exotic screen, no reinvention: just the index's fastest-growing names, in the cheapest wrapper tracking that index.
Stated mandate
FTGS The Fund seeks results generally corresponding to the price and yield, before fees and expenses, of The Growth StrengthTM Index. Normally, it invests at least 80% of net assets in the common stocks and REITs comprising that Index.
SPYG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It provides exposure to S&P 500 companies selected for strong growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTGS vs SPYG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTGS vs SPYG Cost
Overpaying FTGS vs SPYG
$10,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTGS 0.60%
$11,817
SPYG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTGS | SPYG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $73 | $1,003 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $288 | $3,828 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $849 | $10,968 |
- 0.60%FTGS
- 0.04%SPYG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SPYG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
FTGS 32nd cheapest of 35 funds
FTGS vs SPYG Dividends
- FTGS 0.04%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- FTGS $0.01
- SPYG $0.59
- FTGS $0.0088
- SPYG $0.15
- FTGS Sep 24, 2026
- SPYG Sep 21, 2026
- FTGS Sep 30, 2026
- SPYG Sep 23, 2026
- FTGS Twice a year
- SPYG Quarterly
Distribution history
FTGS vs SPYG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTGS 13.8%, betterSPYG 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTGS 0.94SPYG 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- FTGS −20.0%SPYG −32.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FTGS 1.02SPYG 1.17
FTGS and SPYG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

