VUG ranks 5th and FTGS 28th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
FTGS vs VUG
VUG −0.57pt a year
0.60%0.03%
VUG 54.8×the volume
115K6.32M
VUG +6.8pt
+17.8%+24.6%
FTGS vs VUG Performance
+5.2%+2.7%
- FTGS 0.60%
- VUG 0.03%, better
- FTGS $1.27B
- VUG $392B
- FTGS +5.2%, better
- VUG +2.7%
- FTGS 0.04%
- VUG 0.41%, better
- FTGS 51
- VUG 136
- FTGS 115K sh
- VUG 6.32M sh, better
- FTGS $37.48
- VUG $85.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTGS | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A76 | A99Higher |
| Risk | A70Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D39 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | D29 |
| Durability | D38 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. FTGS and VUG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTGSC
VUGA
In short
FTGS Growth with a credit check. FTGS holds about 50 US names that clear screens for return on equity, long-term debt against cash, and revenue and cash flow growth. Growth that funds itself, rather than borrows for it.
VUG Three basis points buys roughly 170 US large-cap growth names. Running since 2004, over $100 billion in assets, and it tracks its index about as closely as an index fund can.
Stated mandate
FTGS The Fund seeks results generally corresponding to the price and yield, before fees and expenses, of The Growth StrengthTM Index. Normally, it invests at least 80% of net assets in the common stocks and REITs comprising that Index.
VUG The fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of large-capitalization growth stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTGS vs VUG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTGS vs VUG Cost
Overpaying FTGS vs VUG
$11,179
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTGS 0.60%
$11,817
VUG 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTGS | VUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $55 | $1,021 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $216 | $3,900 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $638 | $11,179 |
- 0.60%FTGS
- 0.03%VUG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
VUG cheapest of 35 funds
FTGS 32nd cheapest of 35 funds
FTGS vs VUG Dividends
- FTGS 0.04%
- VUG 0.41%, better
- FTGS $0.01
- VUG $0.35
- FTGS $0.0088
- VUG $0.09
- FTGS Sep 24, 2026
- VUG Sep 28, 2026
- FTGS Sep 30, 2026
- VUG Sep 30, 2026
- FTGS Twice a year
- VUG Quarterly
Distribution history
FTGS vs VUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTGS 13.8%, betterVUG 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTGS 0.94VUG 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- FTGS −20.0%VUG −35.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FTGS 1.02VUG 1.23
FTGS and VUG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


