VCRM ranks 2nd and FTMN 41st of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
FTMN vs VCRM
VCRM −0.23pt a year
0.35%0.12%
VCRM 2.0×the volume
357K730K
FTMN vs VCRM Performance
0.0%+1.9%
- FTMN 0.35%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- FTMN $289M
- VCRM $2.2B
- FTMN
- VCRM +2.3%
- FTMN
- VCRM 3.75%
- FTMN 225
- VCRM 2595
- FTMN 357K sh
- VCRM 730K sh, better
- FTMN $8.59
- VCRM $74.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTMN | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A88 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D36 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. FTMN and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTMNC
VCRMA
In short
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTMN vs VCRM Holdings
How FTMN and VCRM differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country97.8%
Sector
| Sector | More in FTMNMore in VCRM | Gap | FTMN | VCRM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal | FTMN +0.3 points | 100.0% | 99.7% | |
| Securitized | VCRM +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FTMNMore in VCRM | Gap | FTMN | VCRM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | VCRM +2.2 points | 97.6% | 99.8% | |
| Puerto Rico | FTMN +2.2 points | 2.4% | 0.2% |
Concentration
- FTMN19.4%
- VCRM8.8%
- FTMN223
- VCRM2,433
Asset class
- FTMN
- Bonds
- VCRM
- Bonds
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. FTMN holds 223 securities, VCRM 2,433.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTMN vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying FTMN vs VCRM
$4,606
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTMN 0.35%
$7,126
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTMN | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $220 | $414 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $859 | $1,595 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $2,520 | $4,606 |
- 0.35%FTMN
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
FTMN 37th cheapest of 63 funds
FTMN vs VCRM Dividends
- FTMN
- VCRM 3.75%
- FTMN
- VCRM $2.80
- FTMN $0.03
- VCRM $0.21
- FTMN Nov 2, 2026
- VCRM Nov 2, 2026
- FTMN Nov 5, 2026
- VCRM Nov 4, 2026
- FTMN Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
FTMN vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTMN VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTMN VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- FTMN VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FTMN 0.17VCRM 0.17Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.