VCRM ranks 4th and FTMU 27th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
FTMU vs VCRM
VCRM −0.18pt a year
0.30%0.12%
VCRM 2.3×the volume
290K679K
FTMU vs VCRM Performance
+0.4%+1.1%
- FTMU 0.30%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- FTMU $489M
- VCRM $2.2B
- FTMU +0.4%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- FTMU
- VCRM 3.81%
- FTMU 282
- VCRM 2588
- FTMU 290K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- FTMU $7.56
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTMU | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A84 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C45 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A73 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B63 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. FTMU and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTMUB
VCRMA
In short
FTMU A municipal bond strategy with roots going back to 1976, now running inside an ETF. The job: income exempt from federal tax, spread across roughly 300 bonds, measured against the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index, at a fee sitting right on the category median.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
FTMU The fund seeks a high level of current income exempt from federal income tax, consistent with preservation of capital.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTMU vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTMU vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying FTMU vs VCRM
$3,629
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTMU 0.30%
$6,149
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTMU | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $220 | $325 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $859 | $1,254 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $2,520 | $3,629 |
- 0.30%FTMU
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
FTMU 30th cheapest of 63 funds
FTMU vs VCRM Dividends
- FTMU
- VCRM 3.81%
- FTMU
- VCRM $2.82
- FTMU $0.03
- VCRM $0.21
- FTMU Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- FTMU Oct 6, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- FTMU Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
FTMU vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTMU 7.2%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTMU −0.44VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- FTMU −7.6%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FTMU 0.16VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.