ICSH ranks 1st and FTSM 36th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
FTSM vs ICSH
ICSH −0.21pt a year
0.29%0.08%
ICSH 2.3×the volume
720K1.64M
ICSH +0.3pt
+2.6%+2.9%
FTSM vs ICSH Performance
+20.2%+21.3%
- FTSM 0.29%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- FTSM $6.8B
- ICSH $8.97B
- FTSM +3.6%
- ICSH +3.6%
- FTSM 4.45%, better
- ICSH 4.13%
- FTSM 742
- ICSH 408
- FTSM 720K sh
- ICSH 1.64M sh, better
- FTSM $59.60
- ICSH $50.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTSM | ICSH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | A76 | A76 |
| Holdings | A93 | A95Higher |
| Durability | A88 | A90Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. FTSM and ICSH are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTSMB
ICSHA
In short
FTSM A 2014-vintage active take on the cash-parking shelf: First Trust's managers roam short-duration investment-grade debt across sectors instead of tracking an index, chasing current income while preserving capital and keeping daily liquidity.
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
FTSM The fund seeks current income while preserving capital and maintaining daily liquidity. It is actively managed and invests in short-duration, primarily U.S.-dollar-denominated, investment-grade securities across a broad range of asset classes.
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTSM vs ICSH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTSM vs ICSH Cost
Overpaying FTSM vs ICSH
$4,263
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTSM 0.29%
$5,952
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTSM | ICSH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $147 | $380 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $575 | $1,469 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $1,689 | $4,263 |
- 0.29%FTSM
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
FTSM 68th cheapest of 78 funds
FTSM vs ICSH Dividends
- FTSM 4.45%, better
- ICSH 4.13%
- FTSM $2.65
- ICSH $2.08
- FTSM $0.21
- ICSH $0.17
- FTSM Oct 30, 2026
- ICSH Oct 1, 2026
- FTSM Pays Nov 3, 2026
- ICSH Oct 6, 2026
- FTSM Monthly
- ICSH Monthly
Distribution history
FTSM vs ICSH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTSM
- ICSH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTSM 0.5%ICSH 0.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTSM 0.29ICSH 0.87, better
- Worst fall
- FTSM −0.6%, betterICSH −0.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FTSM 0.05ICSH 0.04
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.