VUSB ranks 3rd and FTSM 36th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
FTSM vs VUSB
VUSB −0.19pt a year
0.29%0.10%
VUSB 2.7×the volume
720K1.97M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+3.7%+3.7%
FTSM vs VUSB Performance
+20.2%+20.0%
- FTSM 0.29%
- VUSB 0.10%, better
- FTSM $6.8B
- VUSB $9.9B
- FTSM +3.6%
- VUSB +3.7%, better
- FTSM 4.45%, better
- VUSB 4.27%
- FTSM 742
- VUSB 1348
- FTSM 720K sh
- VUSB 1.97M sh, better
- FTSM $59.60
- VUSB $49.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTSM | VUSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | A76Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | A93Higher | A90 |
| Durability | A88 | A89Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. FTSM and VUSB are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTSMB
VUSBA
In short
FTSM A 2014-vintage active take on the cash-parking shelf: First Trust's managers roam short-duration investment-grade debt across sectors instead of tracking an index, chasing current income while preserving capital and keeping daily liquidity.
VUSB Vanguard's first actively managed bond ETF, run by its in-house fixed income team and priced at 0.10%. It holds investment-grade paper maturing inside two years: a step past a money fund, well short of a real bond fund.
Stated mandate
FTSM The fund seeks current income while preserving capital and maintaining daily liquidity. It is actively managed and invests in short-duration, primarily U.S.-dollar-denominated, investment-grade securities across a broad range of asset classes.
VUSB The fund seeks current income with limited price volatility while investing in diversified high- and medium-quality fixed-income securities. It expects to maintain a dollar-weighted average maturity of 0–2 years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTSM vs VUSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTSM vs VUSB Cost
Overpaying FTSM vs VUSB
$3,846
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTSM 0.29%
$5,952
VUSB 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTSM | VUSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $183 | $344 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $717 | $1,327 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $2,106 | $3,846 |
- 0.29%FTSM
- 0.10%VUSB, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
VUSB 13th cheapest of 78 funds
FTSM 68th cheapest of 78 funds
FTSM vs VUSB Dividends
- FTSM 4.45%, better
- VUSB 4.27%
- FTSM $2.65
- VUSB $2.12
- FTSM $0.21
- VUSB $0.18
- FTSM Oct 30, 2026
- VUSB Oct 1, 2026
- FTSM Pays Nov 3, 2026
- VUSB Oct 5, 2026
- FTSM Monthly
- VUSB Monthly
Distribution history
FTSM vs VUSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTSM
- VUSB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTSM 0.5%, betterVUSB 0.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTSM 0.29VUSB 0.86, better
- Worst fall
- FTSM −0.6%, betterVUSB −1.7%
- Market sensitivity
- FTSM 0.05VUSB 0.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.