PANG ranks 3rd and FUTG 32nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
FUTG vs PANG
FUTG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
FUTG 18.5×the volume
827K44.6K
FUTG vs PANG Performance
−86.3%+91.6%
- FUTG 0.75%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- FUTG $13M
- PANG $9M
- FUTG −86.3%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- FUTG 4
- PANG 4
- FUTG 827K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- FUTG $3.05
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FUTG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | B67 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D36 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A72 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B57 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. FUTG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FUTGB
PANGA
In short
FUTG Leveraged single-stock ETFs mostly crowd around megacap tech. FUTG aims 2x daily leverage at a financials name instead, Futu (FUTU), and charges 0.75% a year to do it.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
FUTG The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of the FUTU underlying stock.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FUTG vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FUTG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs FUTG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FUTG 0.75%
$14,482
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FUTG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%FUTG, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
FUTG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
FUTG vs PANG Dividends
- FUTG None
- PANG
- FUTG
- PANG $1.30
- FUTG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- FUTG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- FUTG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
FUTG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FUTG 92.6%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FUTG −1.48PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- FUTG −86.3%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FUTG 1.37PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.