VUG ranks 5th and FYC 28th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
FYC vs VUG
VUG −0.67pt a year
0.70%0.03%
VUG 79.8×the volume
79.2K6.32M
VUG +3.4pt
+14.2%+17.6%
FYC vs VUG Performance
+54.4%+67.0%
- FYC 0.70%
- VUG 0.03%, better
- FYC $1.35B
- VUG $392B
- FYC +20.3%, better
- VUG +2.7%
- FYC 0.11%
- VUG 0.41%, better
- FYC 263
- VUG 136
- FYC 79.2K sh
- VUG 6.32M sh, better
- FYC $114.02
- VUG $85.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FYC | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A99Higher |
| Risk | C48 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A79Higher | D29 |
| Durability | B59 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. FYC and VUG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FYCC
VUGA
In short
FYC Small-cap growth, but not by market cap. The AlphaDEX screen ranks the Nasdaq US 700 Small Cap universe on growth and value factors, keeps the best scorers, tiers their weights by rank, and reshuffles quarterly. Rules-based stock picking, not index hugging.
VUG Three basis points buys roughly 170 US large-cap growth names. Running since 2004, over $100 billion in assets, and it tracks its index about as closely as an index fund can.
Stated mandate
FYC The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index through an indexing approach.
VUG The fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of large-capitalization growth stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FYC vs VUG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FYC vs VUG Cost
Overpaying FYC vs VUG
$12,968
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FYC 0.70%
$13,606
VUG 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FYC | VUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $55 | $1,195 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $216 | $4,544 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $638 | $12,968 |
- 0.70%FYC
- 0.03%VUG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
VUG cheapest of 35 funds
FYC 35th cheapest of 35 funds
FYC vs VUG Dividends
- FYC 0.11%
- VUG 0.41%, better
- FYC $0.13
- VUG $0.35
- FYC $0.13
- VUG $0.09
- FYC Jun 25, 2026
- VUG Sep 28, 2026
- FYC Jun 30, 2026
- VUG Sep 30, 2026
- FYC Irregular
- VUG Quarterly
Distribution history
FYC vs VUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FYC
- VUG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FYC 20.4%VUG 17.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FYC 1.18, betterVUG 1.11
- Worst fall
- FYC −35.4%, betterVUG −35.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FYC 1.19VUG 1.23
FYC and VUG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


