SCHG ranks 2nd and FYC 28th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
FYC vs SCHG
SCHG −0.66pt a year
0.70%0.04%
SCHG 95.9×the volume
79.2K7.59M
SCHG +4.3pt
+14.2%+18.5%
FYC vs SCHG Performance
+54.4%+74.3%
- FYC 0.70%
- SCHG 0.04%, better
- FYC $1.35B
- SCHG $61.7B
- FYC +20.3%, better
- SCHG +3.3%
- FYC 0.11%
- SCHG 0.40%, better
- FYC 263
- SCHG 187
- FYC 79.2K sh
- SCHG 7.59M sh, better
- FYC $114.02
- SCHG $34.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FYC | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A92Higher |
| Risk | C48Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | C40 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | A79Higher | D36 |
| Durability | B59 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. FYC and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FYCC
SCHGA
In short
FYC Small-cap growth, but not by market cap. The AlphaDEX screen ranks the Nasdaq US 700 Small Cap universe on growth and value factors, keeps the best scorers, tiers their weights by rank, and reshuffles quarterly. Rules-based stock picking, not index hugging.
SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.
Stated mandate
FYC The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index through an indexing approach.
SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FYC vs SCHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FYC vs SCHG Cost
Overpaying FYC vs SCHG
$12,757
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FYC 0.70%
$13,606
SCHG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FYC | SCHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $73 | $1,177 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $288 | $4,472 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $849 | $12,757 |
- 0.70%FYC
- 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
FYC 35th cheapest of 35 funds
FYC vs SCHG Dividends
- FYC 0.11%
- SCHG 0.40%, better
- FYC $0.13
- SCHG $0.14
- FYC $0.13
- SCHG $0.04
- FYC Jun 25, 2026
- SCHG Sep 23, 2026
- FYC Jun 30, 2026
- SCHG Sep 28, 2026
- FYC Irregular
- SCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
FYC vs SCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FYC
- SCHG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FYC 20.4%SCHG 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FYC 1.18, betterSCHG 1.16
- Worst fall
- FYC −35.4%SCHG −34.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FYC 1.19SCHG 1.20
FYC and SCHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

