IWD ranks 4th and FYT 34th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.
FYT vs IWD
IWD −0.52pt a year
0.70%0.18%
IWD 120.2×the volume
16.7K2.01M
IWD +1.2pt
+10.7%+11.9%
FYT vs IWD Performance
+47.0%+72.9%
- FYT 0.70%
- IWD 0.18%, better
- FYT $178M
- IWD $83.2B
- FYT +31.3%, better
- IWD +28.4%
- FYT 1.84%, better
- IWD 1.37%
- FYT 263
- IWD 874
- FYT 16.7K sh
- IWD 2.01M sh, better
- FYT $70.00
- IWD $258.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FYT | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F5 | B59Higher |
| Mission | A82 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D26 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A96Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C42 |
| Durability | C52 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Value Index funds
Same Category. FYT and IWD are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FYTC
IWDA
In short
FYT Most value funds just buy the market, cap-weighted. FYT ranks small caps on growth and value factors, hands the top scorers the most weight, and reshuffles quarterly. A quant stock picker in index clothing.
IWD The original Russell 1000 Value tracker, live since 2000 and still one of the most traded ways to own the value half of US large caps. Roughly 900 stocks, followed closely, at a price that reflects the plumbing.
Stated mandate
FYT The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in index securities and uses an indexing approach to replicate the index’s performance.
IWD The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks that may be undervalued relative to comparable companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FYT vs IWD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FYT vs IWD Cost
Overpaying FYT vs IWD
$9,857
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FYT 0.70%
$13,606
IWD 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FYT | IWD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $328 | $922 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $1,281 | $3,479 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $3,749 | $9,857 |
- 0.70%FYT
- 0.18%IWD, cheaper
- Middle half of US Value Index funds
- Median 0.20%
IWD 16th cheapest of 40 funds
FYT 38th cheapest of 40 funds
FYT vs IWD Dividends
- FYT 1.84%, better
- IWD 1.37%
- FYT $1.29
- IWD $3.53
- FYT $0.47
- IWD $0.93
- FYT Sep 24, 2026
- IWD Sep 15, 2026
- FYT Sep 30, 2026
- IWD Sep 18, 2026
- FYT Quarterly
- IWD Quarterly
Distribution history
FYT vs IWD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FYT
- IWD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FYT 19.9%IWD 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FYT 0.71IWD 1.42, better
- Worst fall
- FYT −28.9%IWD −19.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FYT 1.00IWD 0.85
FYT and IWD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





