FYT vs SCHV: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund

FYTCNasdaq

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

SCHVANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SCHV −0.66pt a year

FYT0.70%SCHV0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHV 189.9×the volume

FYT16.7KSCHV3.17M

10Y return · a year

SCHV +0.9pt

FYT+10.7%SCHV+11.6%

FYT vs SCHV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+47.0%FYT+63.8%SCHV

Expense ratio: FYT 0.70%; SCHV 0.04%, better
Fund size: FYT $178M; SCHV $15.7B
1Y total return: FYT +31.3%, better; SCHV +22.1%
Yield (12M): FYT 1.84%, better; SCHV 1.81%
Holdings: FYT 263; SCHV 568
Avg volume (30D): FYT 16.7K sh; SCHV 3.17M sh, better
NAV per share: FYT $70.00; SCHV $34.62
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for FYT, SCHV, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	FYT	SCHV
Cost30% weight	F5	A96Higher
Mission25% weight	A82	A88Higher
Risk15% weight	D26	B68Higher
Tradability15% weight	C50	A95Higher
Holdings10% weight	A76Higher	B59
Durability5% weight	C52	B68Higher

Rank among US Value Index funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. FYT and SCHV are both graded against the same 40 US Value Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Value Index⁠

Category · 40 funds

See all 40 ›

SCHV ranks 1st and FYT 34th of 40 funds in the US Value Index Category.

Rank 1ASCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETFScore 84
Rank 2AVTVVanguard Morningstar Value ETFScore 83
Rank 32CNIXTResearch Affiliates Deletions ETFScore 45
Rank 34CFYTFirst Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX FundScore 43
Rank 34CRZVInvesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETFScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FYTCFirst Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund

SCHVASchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

In short

FYT Most value funds just buy the market, cap-weighted. FYT ranks small caps on growth and value factors, hands the top scorers the most weight, and reshuffles quarterly. A quant stock picker in index clothing.

SCHV No data

Stated mandate

FYT The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Value Index. It normally invests at least 90% of net assets in index securities and uses an indexing approach to replicate the index’s performance.

SCHV No data

Why people hold it

FYT The AlphaDEX rulebook scores small caps on growth and value factors, keeps the top names, then sorts them into tiers so higher-scoring groups carry more weight. Equal weight inside each tier.nasdaqomx.com
Quarterly reconstitution recycles the roster four times a year, so the portfolio keeps re-ranking instead of drifting into whatever worked years ago.nasdaqomx.com nasdaqomx.com 2
Roughly 300 names, with weight set by score tier rather than piled into the largest companies. No single holding runs the show.nasdaqomx.com
Trading since 2011, and built to replicate rather than outguess: at least 90% of net assets sit in index securities, and it has stayed close to that index.

SCHV No data

Worth knowing

FYT 0.70% a year against a roughly 0.20% median for US value ETFs, and giants like VTV and IUSV sit near a nickel. That gap is the price of the screen.
Thinly traded on a modest asset base, so spreads can run wider than the household-name funds in this category. Limit orders matter more here.
Small caps plus a factor screen swing harder than the large-cap value indexes that anchor this group, and can spend long stretches looking nothing like plain vanilla value.

SCHV No data

Full FYT profile⁠

Full SCHV profile⁠

FYT vs SCHV Holdings

How FYT and SCHV differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of FYT and 0.0% of SCHV.

Level by level

Holdings0 in both0.0%
Sector11 Sectors77.9%
Countryby domicile98.9%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FYT and SCHV, widest gap first
Sector	More in FYTMore in SCHV	FYT	SCHV
Consumer Discretionary	FYT +15.1 points	21.4%	6.3%
Technology	SCHV +11.3 points	6.3%	17.6%
Health Care	SCHV +9.2 points	5.0%	14.2%
Real Estate	FYT +3.7 points	7.7%	4.0%
Financials	FYT +1.7 points	22.1%	20.4%
Materials	FYT +1.1 points	3.9%	2.8%
Utilities	SCHV +1.0 points	2.9%	3.9%
Industrials	SCHV +0.4 points	10.9%	11.3%
Energy	FYT +0.3 points	7.6%	7.3%
Consumer Staples	FYT +0.1 points	8.9%	8.8%
Communication	SCHV +0.1 points	3.4%	3.5%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FYT and SCHV, widest gap first
Country	More in FYTMore in SCHV	FYT	SCHV
United States	FYT +0.8 points	99.7%	98.9%
Switzerland	SCHV +0.6 points	0.0%	0.6%
Other countries (5)	SCHV +0.1 points	0.3%	0.4%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

FYT7.4%
SCHV19.9%

Securities held

FYT262
SCHV568

Asset class

FYT: Equity
SCHV: Equity

Holdings

Only in FYT262
In both0
Only in SCHV568

Only in FYT

262 securities, 99.8% of FYT by weight

DXC Technology Company0.84%
Kohl's Corporation0.80%
Harley-Davidson, Inc.0.78%
Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.0.75%
MAXIMUS, Inc.0.73%
Comstock Resources, Inc.0.73%
Everforth Incorporated0.71%
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.0.70%
Bath & Body Works, Inc.0.70%
NMI Holdings, Inc. (Class A)0.70%
Post Holdings, Inc.0.70%
PROG Holdings Inc.0.68%
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.0.68%
Gulfport Energy Corporation0.67%
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.0.67%
Vistance Networks Inc.0.67%
MillerKnoll Inc.0.67%
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.0.66%
Avista Corporation0.65%
Thor Industries, Inc.0.65%
SiriusPoint Ltd.0.65%
Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. (Class B)0.65%
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.0.64%
Assured Guaranty Ltd.0.63%
Resideo Technologies, Inc.0.63%
Yelp Inc.0.63%
Bristow Group Inc.0.63%
Graham Holdings Company0.63%
La-Z-Boy Incorporated0.63%
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.0.62%
Carter's, Inc.0.61%
Innoviva, Inc.0.61%
Ingles Markets, Incorporated0.60%
Walker & Dunlop, Inc.0.60%
Graphic Packaging Holding Company0.60%
Dorian LPG Ltd.0.60%
TriMas Corporation0.60%
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.0.60%
Seaboard Corporation0.60%
BKV Corporation0.60%
Whirlpool Corporation0.59%
Array Digital Infrastructure Inc0.59%
Mattel, Inc.0.59%
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.0.59%
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.0.59%
Sunrun Inc.0.59%
BellRing Brands, Inc.0.58%
Kennametal Inc.0.58%
Strategic Education, Inc.0.57%
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.0.57%

Only in SCHV

568 securities, 100% of SCHV by weight

Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B3.29%
JPMorgan Chase2.98%
Exxonmobil Holdings Corp2.46%
Johnson & Johnson2.16%
Walmart1.76%
AbbVie1.67%
Intel Corporation Corp1.49%
Chevron1.49%
Cisco Systems Inc1.39%
Procter & Gamble1.22%
Merck & Co Inc1.18%
Coca-Cola1.17%
Bank of America1.08%
Home Depot1.07%
Philip Morris International1.06%
Lam Research1.04%
Texas Instrument0.93%
Goldman Sachs Group0.88%
Rtx0.88%
Netflix0.84%
Wells Fargo0.84%
Amgen Inc0.81%
International Business Machines Co0.79%
Oracle0.79%
Morgan Stanley0.74%
Analog Devices0.69%
Citigroup0.69%
Gilead Sciences0.67%
Amphenol Corp Class A0.66%
Qualcomm0.65%
Space Exploration Technologies Cor0.64%
Marvell Technology0.62%
Salesforce0.62%
Pepsico0.59%
Mcdonalds Corp0.59%
Verizon Communications Inc0.59%
Abbott Laboratories0.59%
Conocophillips0.59%
Union Pacific0.58%
Nextera Energy0.56%
Pfizer0.56%
American Express0.56%
Welltower0.55%
Tjx0.51%
Accenture PLC Class A0.49%
Danaher0.48%
Charles Schwab0.47%
Dell Technologies Inc Class C0.47%
AT&T0.47%
Progressive0.44%

Weight gaps

FYT and SCHV share no securities.

All 262 FYT holdings⁠All 570 SCHV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FYT vs SCHV Cost

Overpaying FYT vs SCHV

$12,757

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

FYT 0.70%
$13,606
SCHV 0.04%
$849

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

FYT 0.70%
SCHV 0.04%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	FYT	SCHV	Overpaying
10	$1,250	$73	$1,177
20	$4,760	$288	$4,472
30	$13,606	$849	$12,757

Expense ratio

0.70%FYT
0.04%SCHV, cheaper

SCHV0.04%FYT0.70%

0.03%0.80%

Middle half of US Value Index funds
Median 0.20%

SCHV 3rd cheapest of 40 funds

FYT 38th cheapest of 40 funds

FYT vs SCHV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): FYT 1.84%, better; SCHV 1.81%
Payout (12M): FYT $1.29; SCHV $0.63
Last payment: FYT $0.47; SCHV $0.16
Ex-dividend: FYT Sep 24, 2026; SCHV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on: FYT Sep 30, 2026; SCHV Sep 28, 2026
Frequency: FYT Quarterly; SCHV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FYTQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll FYT payments⁠

SCHVQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll SCHV payments⁠

FYT vs SCHV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

FYT
SCHV

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: FYT 19.9%SCHV 11.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: FYT 0.71SCHV 1.31, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: FYT −28.9%SCHV −19.8%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: FYT 1.00SCHV 0.76; Market = 1

FYT and SCHV in the news

All news⁠

Best ETFs
Best value ETFs: Vanguard's 0.03% fund, unless you want Russell's list
Updated Nov 2, 2026SCHV
Category Review
One US value fund returned 68% with Micron at 22.5%. The median returned 22%
Updated Sep 23, 2026SCHV

Popular comparisons

FYTCvsVTVA
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund · Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.70% · 0.03%
Category
SCHVAvsVTVA
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.04% · 0.03%
Category
FYTCvsIUSVA
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund · iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.70% · 0.04%
Category
SCHVAvsIUSVA
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.04% · 0.04%
Category
FYTCvsIWDA
First Trust Small Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund · iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.70% · 0.18%
Category
SCHVAvsIWDA
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF · iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.04% · 0.18%
Category

FYT vs SCHV

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How FYT and SCHV differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in FYT

Only in SCHV

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Best value ETFs: Vanguard's 0.03% fund, unless you want Russell's list

One US value fund returned 68% with Micron at 22.5%. The median returned 22%

How FYT and SCHV differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in FYT

Only in SCHV

Weight gaps