Skip to content

GAPR vs PSMR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April

GAPRCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

PSMRBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMR −0.36pt a year

GAPR0.85%PSMR0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GAPR 6.0×the volume

GAPR6.56KPSMR1.08K

3Y return · a year

PSMR +0.9pt

GAPR+11.0%PSMR+11.9%

GAPR vs PSMR Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+7.8%GAPR+12.5%PSMR

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. GAPR +7.8%. PSMR +12.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%10%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GAPR 0.85%
PSMR 0.49%, better
Fund size
GAPR $290M
PSMR $90M
1Y total return
GAPR +7.8%
PSMR +12.5%, better
Holdings
GAPR 3
PSMR 3
Avg volume (30D)
GAPR 6.56K sh, better
PSMR 1.08K sh
NAV per share
GAPR $41.97
PSMR $32.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GAPR: Cost 13, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 62, Durability 70. PSMR: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for GAPR, PSMR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGAPRPSMR
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB63HigherB56
Tradability15% weightB58HigherD32
Holdings10% weightB62Not scored
Durability5% weightA70HigherB64

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GAPR and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMR ranks 3rd and GAPR 27th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 24CGOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 43
  6. Rank 27CGAPRFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - AprilScore 42
  7. Rank 27CGAUGFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - AugustScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GAPRCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April

PSMRBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

In short

GAPR The April door on First Trust's monthly buffer ladder: it aims to absorb the first 15% of a one-year drop in the S&P 500's price and gives up gains above a cap set each April. Same recipe as its sibling months, different start date.

PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.

Stated mandate

GAPR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a set cap while protecting the first 15% of losses during the April 20, 2026–April 16, 2027 outcome period.

PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • GAPR Terms are contractual, not discretionary: the first 15% of losses absorbed, upside capped, over a defined April-to-April window whose cap is published before the period starts.ftportfolios.com
  • Twelve monthly siblings exist (GMAY, GJUN, GSEP and the rest), so you can choose an entry month or ladder across several rather than leaning on one 12-month window.
  • The yardstick is the price return of the largest S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is measured against something you can watch tick by tick instead of a bespoke index.
  • PSMR Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median in its buffered-SPY cohort, and undercuts Pacer's own single-month siblings like PJUL and POCT at 0.79%.
  • The contract is spelled out: a 15-point buffer against SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over roughly a one-year period, with upside capped at a level set when the period begins.paceretfs.com
  • Terms reset on April 1 each year, so the new buffer and cap arrive on a known calendar date instead of whenever you happened to buy in.paceretfs.com
  • Running since 2021, so this April series has cycled through several complete outcome periods rather than being a fresh launch with a paper track record.

Worth knowing

  • GAPR At 0.85% a year it sits at the pricier end of the buffer shelf; BUFF, a laddered rival in the same group, charges 0.10%.
  • Buy mid-period and the math shifts: the full 15% cushion and the stated cap apply to holders who own it from one April reset to the next.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's giants, and it follows price return only, so S&P 500 dividends and regular income are not part of the design.
  • PSMR Thinly traded next to the biggest names in buffer land, so spreads and order size are worth a look before you place a trade.
  • The cap cuts both ways: big SPY years get trimmed, and the stated buffer and cap only line up in full for a holder who rides one April reset to the next.
  • Not an income vehicle. It has not been paying a regular distribution, so whatever the strategy delivers shows up in the share price.

Full GAPR profile⁠

Full PSMR profile⁠

GAPR vs PSMR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GAPR vs PSMR Cost

Overpaying GAPR vs PSMR

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GAPR 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMR 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GAPR 0.85%
  • PSMR 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GAPR $16,199PSMR $9,792

Year by year

YearGAPRPSMROverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GAPR
  • 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GAPR 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GAPR vs PSMR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
GAPR None
PSMR None

Distribution history

GAPRAll GAPR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMRAll PSMR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GAPR vs PSMR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GAPR 4.4%, betterPSMR 6.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GAPR 1.59, betterPSMR 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GAPR −9.0%since Apr 2023PSMR −11.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GAPR 0.29PSMR 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • GAPRCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GAPRCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GAPRCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - April · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.