Skip to content
etf.net

GASZ vs KWH

Corgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETF

GASZCCboe

GMO Power Infrastructure ETF

KWHCNYSE Arca

Overlap

8.2%by weight

Expense ratio

GASZ −0.25pt a year

GASZ0.35%KWH0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

KWH 19.4×the volume

GASZ1.97KKWH38.2K

GASZ vs KWH Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−11.0%GASZ−6.0%KWH

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GASZ −11.0%. KWH −6.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GASZ 0.35%, better
KWH 0.60%
Fund size
GASZ $9M
KWH $54M
Holdings
GASZ 23
KWH 82
Avg volume (30D)
GASZ 1.97K sh
KWH 38.2K sh, better
NAV per share
GASZ $20.61
KWH $23.18
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GASZ: Cost 85, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings 40, Durability 20. KWH: Cost 36, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 66, Durability 47.
Pillar letters and Scores for GASZ, KWH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGASZKWH
Cost30% weightA85HigherD36
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD39B62Higher
Tradability15% weightF24C41Higher
Holdings10% weightC40B66Higher
Durability5% weightF20C47Higher

Rank among Grid & Electrification funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GASZ and KWH are both graded against the same 10 Grid & Electrification funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Grid & Electrification⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

GASZ ranks 4th and KWH 6th of 10 funds in the Grid & Electrification Category.

  1. Rank 1BZAPGlobal X U.S. Electrification ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BELFYALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BGRIDFirst Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index FundScore 57
  4. Rank 4CGASZCorgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 5CJOULCorgi High Voltage Grid Equipment ETFScore 51
  6. Rank 6CKWHGMO Power Infrastructure ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 6CVOLTTema Electrification ETFScore 46

GASZ vs KWH Holdings

How GASZ and KWH differ

Overlap by weight

8.2%

Shared holdings make up 31.0% of GASZ and 8.2% of KWH.

Level by level

  • Holdings5 in both8.2%
  • Countryby domicile51.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for KWH.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GASZ and KWH, widest gap first
CountryMore in GASZMore in KWH
United StatesGASZ +48.4 points
GermanyKWH +8.4 points
United KingdomKWH +6.9 points
FranceKWH +6.4 points
South KoreaKWH +4.4 points
ItalyKWH +3.7 points
SwitzerlandKWH +3.1 points
SpainKWH +3.0 points
Other countries (9)KWH +12.7 points

Outside the US: KWH 84% developed, 16% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GASZ63.5%
  • KWH29.6%

Securities held

  • GASZ22
  • KWH79

Asset class

GASZ
Equity
KWH
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GASZ17
  • In both5
  • Only in KWH74

Only in GASZ

17 securities, 68.8% of GASZ by weight

  • Caterpillar Inc11.48%
  • ONEOK Inc5.54%
  • Woodward Inc5.03%

Only in KWH

74 securities, 91.8% of KWH by weight

  • Siemens AG Reg4.32%
  • Schneider Electric SE4.21%
  • Iberdrola SA2.80%

Weight gaps

All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GASZ and KWH, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GASZMore in KWH
GE Vernova IncGEVGASZ +9.33 points
Kinder Morgan IncKMIGASZ +4.93 points
Cheniere Energy IncLNGGASZ +4.27 points
Archrock IncAROCGASZ +2.91 points
Eaton Corp PLCETNGASZ +1.38 points

All 30 GASZ holdings⁠All KWH holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GASZ vs KWH Cost

Overpaying KWH vs GASZ

$4,691

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GASZ 0.35%

    $7,126

  • KWH 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GASZ 0.35%
  • KWH 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530KWH $11,817GASZ $7,126

Year by year

YearGASZKWHOverpaying
10$634$1,076$442
20$2,454$4,116$1,662
30$7,126$11,817$4,691

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%GASZ, cheaper
  • 0.60%KWH
  • Middle half of Grid & Electrification funds
  • Median 0.53%

GASZ cheapest of 10 funds

KWH 7th cheapest of 10 funds

GASZ vs KWH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GASZ None
KWH None

Distribution history

GASZAll GASZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

KWHAll KWH payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GASZ vs KWH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GASZ −2.04KWH 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • GASZCvsZAPB

    Corgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETF · Global X U.S. Electrification ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KWHCvsZAPB

    GMO Power Infrastructure ETF · Global X U.S. Electrification ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GASZCvsELFYB

    Corgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETF · ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KWHCvsELFYB

    GMO Power Infrastructure ETF · ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GASZCvsGRIDB

    Corgi Natural Gas Power & Turbines ETF · First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.56%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • KWHCvsGRIDB

    GMO Power Infrastructure ETF · First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.56%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.