Skip to content
etf.net

GCPB vs GINC

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust

GCPBBNYSE

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust

GINCANYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

GCPB −0.05pt a year

GCPB0.35%GINC0.40%

Avg volume · 30D

GINC 5.1×the volume

GCPB10.4KGINC53K

GCPB vs GINC Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.1%GCPB+1.0%GINC

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GCPB +2.1%. GINC +1.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.5%1.5%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
GCPB 0.35%, better
GINC 0.40%
Fund size
GCPB $155M
GINC $212M
Holdings
GCPB 355
GINC 491
Avg volume (30D)
GCPB 10.4K sh
GINC 53K sh, better
NAV per share
GCPB $49.14
GINC $48.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GCPB: Cost 92, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 41, Durability 80. GINC: Cost 81, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 78, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for GCPB, GINC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGCPBGINC
Cost30% weightA92HigherA81
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD26C47Higher
Tradability15% weightB56A72Higher
Holdings10% weightC41A78Higher
Durability5% weightA80A81Higher

Rank among Multi-Sector Bond Income funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GCPB and GINC are both graded against the same 23 Multi-Sector Bond Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Sector Bond Income⁠

Category · 23 funds
See all 23 ›

GINC ranks 2nd and GCPB 8th of 23 funds in the Multi-Sector Bond Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AVGMSVanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AAINPAllspring Income Plus ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 2AGINCGoldman Sachs ETF TrustScore 72
  4. Rank 4AXAGGEaton Vance Strategic Income Opportunities ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 6BTMSFT. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 8BGCPBGoldman Sachs ETF TrustScore 63
  7. Rank 9BVMSBVoya Multi-Sector Income ETFScore 58

GCPB vs GINC Holdings

How GCPB and GINC differ

No overlap figure

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile87.1%
  • Asset classFixed Income100%

Sector

No Sector split for GCPB and GINC.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GCPB and GINC, widest gap first
CountryMore in GCPBMore in GINC
United StatesGCPB +12.0 points
Cayman IslandsGINC +4.8 points
United KingdomGINC +3.1 points
ArgentinaGINC +0.8 points
SwitzerlandGINC +0.8 points
CanadaGINC +0.8 points
MexicoGINC +0.7 points
LuxembourgGCPB +0.5 points
Other countries (10)GINC +1.7 points

Outside the US: GINC 35% developed, 65% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GCPB56.4%
  • GINC25.3%

Securities held

  • GCPB347
  • GINC486

Asset class

GCPB
Fixed Income
GINC
Fixed Income

Holdings

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. GCPB holds 347 securities, GINC 486.

All 349 GCPB holdings⁠All 488 GINC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GCPB vs GINC Cost

Overpaying GINC vs GCPB

$964

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GCPB 0.35%

    $7,126

  • GINC 0.40%

    $8,090

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GCPB 0.35%
  • GINC 0.40%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GINC $8,090GCPB $7,126

Year by year

YearGCPBGINCOverpaying
10$634$723$89
20$2,454$2,793$339
30$7,126$8,090$964

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%GCPB, cheaper
  • 0.40%GINC
  • Middle half of Multi-Sector Bond Income funds
  • Median 0.60%

GCPB 2nd cheapest of 23 funds

GINC 5th cheapest of 23 funds

GCPB vs GINC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
GCPB $0.19
GINC $0.18
Ex-dividend
GCPB Oct 1, 2026
GINC Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
GCPB Oct 7, 2026
GINC Oct 7, 2026
Frequency
GCPB Monthly
GINC Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

GCPBMonthly · 2 paymentsAll GCPB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.13; Oct 1, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
GINCMonthly · 2 paymentsAll GINC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.29; Oct 1, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

GCPB vs GINC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GCPB 1.11GINC 0.71

GCPB and GINC in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • GCPBBvsVGMSA

    Goldman Sachs ETF Trust · Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GINCAvsVGMSA

    Goldman Sachs ETF Trust · Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GCPBBvsAINPA

    Goldman Sachs ETF Trust · Allspring Income Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GINCAvsAINPA

    Goldman Sachs ETF Trust · Allspring Income Plus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GCPBBvsXAGGA

    Goldman Sachs ETF Trust · Eaton Vance Strategic Income Opportunities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GINCAvsXAGGA

    Goldman Sachs ETF Trust · Eaton Vance Strategic Income Opportunities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.