Skip to content

GCSH vs XHLF

Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF

GCSHDNYSE Arca

BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF

XHLFANYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

XHLF −0.22pt a year

GCSH0.25%XHLF0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

XHLF 7.4×the volume

GCSH41.5KXHLF309K

GCSH vs XHLF Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.5%GCSH+0.9%XHLF

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GCSH +0.5%. XHLF +0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.2%0.4%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GCSH 0.25%
XHLF 0.03%, better
Fund size
GCSH $269M
XHLF $2.03B
1Y total return
GCSH No data
XHLF +3.6%
Yield (12M)
GCSH No data
XHLF 3.75%
Holdings
GCSH 155
XHLF 29
Avg volume (30D)
GCSH 41.5K sh
XHLF 309K sh, better
NAV per share
GCSH $49.99
XHLF $50.29
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GCSH: Cost 18, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 30, Holdings 52, Durability 35. XHLF: Cost 99, Risk 47, Mission 100, Tradability 79, Holdings 35, Durability 59.
Pillar letters and Scores for GCSH, XHLF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGCSHXHLF
Cost30% weightF18A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA100
Risk15% weightC44C47Higher
Tradability15% weightD30A79Higher
Holdings10% weightC52HigherD35
Durability5% weightD35B59Higher

Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GCSH and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Cash & Ultra-Short Income⁠

Category · 78 funds
See all 78 ›

XHLF ranks 4th and GCSH 74th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.

  1. Rank 4AVBILVanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETFScore 80
  2. Rank 4AXHLFBondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 7ASGOViShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETFScore 79
  4. Rank 73DSGVAF/m Accumulator Ultrashort Treasury FundScore 35
  5. Rank 74DGCSHGuggenheim Ultra Short Income ETFScore 31
  6. Rank 75FLQIDKurv Enhanced Short Maturity ETFScore 18
  7. HBILNot yet graded
  8. LBOXNot yet graded
  9. XCSHNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GCSHDGuggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF

XHLFABondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF

In short

GCSH Most funds in this aisle just roll T-bills. GCSH is active and shops the whole investment-grade short end (corporates, asset-backed, mortgage paper) with duration typically held inside a year.

XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.

Stated mandate

GCSH The Fund seeks a high level of income while preserving capital.

XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.

Why people hold it

  • GCSH Actively managed and multi-sector: investment-grade corporates, securitized and government paper, with average duration no longer than a year. A broader toolkit than a pure T-bill tracker.guggenheiminvestments.comguggenheiminvestments.com 2
  • Guggenheim sold its entire ETF lineup to Invesco in 2018. This 2026 launch is the firm's way back in, wrapping credit strategies it long ran for insurers and pensions.sec.govguggenheiminvestments.com
  • The stated job is a high level of income while preserving capital, with daily liquidity. Guggenheim frames it as a strategic cash position rather than a bond-market bet.guggenheiminvestments.com
  • XHLF Costs 0.03% a year, against a typical short-Treasury peer near 0.14%. In cash-like funds, where returns come from bills everyone owns, fee is the main lever.
  • Tracks an index built to hold an average duration of roughly six months, rebalanced monthly, so exposure stays anchored instead of drifting as bills mature.bondbloxxetf.com
  • Sits in the gap between 0-3 month bill funds and one-year funds. Its sibling XONE targets a one-year duration at the same 0.03%, so the two can be mixed to dial in duration.
  • US Treasury bills only, no credit bets hiding in the portfolio, run in a multi-billion-dollar fund that has stayed close to its index.

Worth knowing

  • GCSH At 0.25% a year it costs more than the index T-bill funds it sits beside, where CLIP, VBIL and TBLL all run under 0.10%. You are paying for the active credit work.
  • Not a money market fund: no stable $1.00 NAV, no FDIC insurance. Corporate and securitized holdings mean the share price can move on credit spreads, not just rates.guggenheiminvestments.com
  • Launched in 2026, so the track record is short and the fund trades less than the entrenched giants in the category.
  • XHLF Six months of duration is not zero. Prices move a touch more when yields shift than in 0-3 month bill funds such as BIL or CLIP.
  • Income rides whatever Treasury bills happen to pay, and distributions arrive on an irregular rhythm rather than a fixed amount or schedule.
  • Volume is moderate next to the largest bill ETFs, so spreads can be a bit wider, which matters more on big tickets than small ones.

Full GCSH profile⁠

Full XHLF profile⁠

GCSH vs XHLF Holdings

How GCSH and XHLF differ

No overlap figure

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile92.6%
  • Asset classFixed Income100%

Sector

No Sector split for GCSH and XHLF.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GCSH and XHLF, widest gap first
CountryMore in GCSHMore in XHLF
United StatesXHLF +7.4 points
CanadaGCSH +3.0 points
BermudaGCSH +1.8 points
IrelandGCSH +1.1 points
SwitzerlandGCSH +0.6 points
United KingdomGCSH +0.6 points
Other countries (6)GCSH +0.2 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GCSH43.0%
  • XHLF79.1%

Securities held

  • GCSH132
  • XHLF29

Asset class

GCSH
Fixed Income
XHLF
Fixed Income

Holdings

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. GCSH holds 132 securities, XHLF 29.

All 388 GCSH holdings⁠All XHLF holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GCSH vs XHLF Cost

Overpaying GCSH vs XHLF

$4,521

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GCSH 0.25%

    $5,159

  • XHLF 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GCSH 0.25%
  • XHLF 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530GCSH $5,159XHLF $638

Year by year

YearGCSHXHLFOverpaying
10$455$55$400
20$1,769$216$1,553
30$5,159$638$4,521

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%GCSH
  • 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
  • Median 0.18%

XHLF cheapest of 78 funds

GCSH 62nd cheapest of 78 funds

GCSH vs XHLF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GCSH No data
XHLF 3.75%
Payout (12M)
GCSH No data
XHLF $1.89
Last payment
GCSH $0.18
XHLF $0.15
Ex-dividend
GCSH Oct 5, 2026
XHLF Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
GCSH Oct 9, 2026
XHLF Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
GCSH Monthly
XHLF Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

GCSHMonthly · 3 paymentsAll GCSH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Aug 5, 2026 $0.32; Sep 3, 2026 $0.13; Oct 5, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
XHLFMonthly · 45 paymentsAll XHLF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 45 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Feb 1, 2023 $0.15; Mar 1, 2023 $0.14; Apr 3, 2023 $0.17; May 1, 2023 $0.14; Jun 1, 2023 $0.22; Jul 3, 2023 $0.15; Aug 1, 2023 $0.21; Sep 1, 2023 $0.22; Oct 2, 2023 $0.19; Nov 1, 2023 $0.22; Dec 1, 2023 $0.21; Dec 28, 2023 $0.23; Feb 1, 2024 $0.23; Mar 1, 2024 $0.20; Apr 1, 2024 $0.22; May 1, 2024 $0.21; Jun 3, 2024 $0.22; Jul 1, 2024 $0.21; Aug 1, 2024 $0.21; Sep 3, 2024 $0.21; Oct 1, 2024 $0.20; Nov 1, 2024 $0.20; Dec 2, 2024 $0.19; Dec 30, 2024 $0.19; Feb 3, 2025 $0.17; Mar 3, 2025 $0.17; Apr 1, 2025 $0.18; May 1, 2025 $0.15; Jun 2, 2025 $0.17; Jul 1, 2025 $0.16; Aug 1, 2025 $0.16; Sep 2, 2025 $0.17; Oct 1, 2025 $0.16; Nov 3, 2025 $0.20; Dec 1, 2025 $0.14; Dec 30, 2025 $0.16; Feb 2, 2026 $0.16; Mar 2, 2026 $0.14; Apr 1, 2026 $0.16; May 1, 2026 $0.15; Jun 1, 2026 $0.15; Jul 1, 2026 $0.15; Aug 3, 2026 $0.15; Sep 1, 2026 $0.16; Oct 1, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

GCSH vs XHLF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GCSH No dataXHLF 0.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GCSH No dataXHLF −0.52
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GCSH No dataXHLF −0.1%since Sep 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GCSH 0.09XHLF 0.03

Popular comparisons

  • GCSHDvsICSHA

    Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF · iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XHLFAvsICSHA

    BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF · iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GCSHDvsCLIPA

    Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF · Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XHLFAvsCLIPA

    BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF · Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GCSHDvsVUSBA

    Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF · Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XHLFAvsVUSBA

    BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF · Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.