PSMO ranks 1st and GFEB 30th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
GFEB vs PSMO
PSMO −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
GFEB 1.6×the volume
11.7K7.3K
GFEB +1.5pt
+14.1%+12.6%
GFEB vs PSMO Performance
+10.2%+10.0%
- GFEB 0.85%
- PSMO 0.49%, better
- GFEB $369M
- PSMO $116M
- GFEB +10.2%, better
- PSMO +10.0%
- GFEB 3
- PSMO 3
- GFEB 11.7K sh, better
- PSMO 7.3K sh
- GFEB $45.04
- PSMO $33.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GFEB | PSMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B56Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B63 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | A75Higher | B66 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. GFEB and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GFEBC
PSMOB
In short
GFEB A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500: GFEB soaks up the first 15% of losses over its outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap that gets reset every February.
PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.
Stated mandate
GFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a 12.05% upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the February 23, 2026–February 19, 2027 outcome period.
PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GFEB vs PSMO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GFEB vs PSMO Cost
Overpaying GFEB vs PSMO
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GFEB 0.85%
$16,199
PSMO 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GFEB | PSMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%GFEB
- 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds
GFEB 37th cheapest of 51 funds
GFEB vs PSMO Dividends
- GFEB None
- PSMO None
Distribution history
GFEB vs PSMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GFEB 6.0%PSMO 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GFEB 1.50, betterPSMO 1.31
- Worst fall
- GFEB −9.6%PSMO −9.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GFEB 0.45PSMO 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.