GIGB ranks 4th and MIG 18th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs MIG
GIGB −0.12pt a year
0.08%0.20%
GIGB 6.7×the volume
83.7K12.5K
MIG +0.5pt
−0.2%+0.3%
GIGB vs MIG Performance
−0.8%+1.6%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- MIG 0.20%
- GIGB $1.04B
- MIG $22M
- GIGB −0.5%, better
- MIG −1.3%
- GIGB 4.77%
- MIG 4.78%, better
- GIGB 2719
- MIG 382
- GIGB 83.7K sh, better
- MIG 12.5K sh
- GIGB $44.25
- MIG $20.53
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | MIG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | B61 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | C45Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | B67 |
| Durability | A74Higher | D32 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and MIG are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
MIGB
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
MIG Most investment-grade bond funds buy the index and move on. MIG hands the screening to Moody's Analytics, whose credit work sorts roughly 400 corporate bonds on quality and value before they get in.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
MIG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS Moody’s Analytics US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs MIG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs MIG Cost
Overpaying MIG vs GIGB
$2,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
MIG 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | MIG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $365 | $218 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,421 | $846 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $4,155 | $2,466 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.20%MIG
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
MIG 20th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs MIG Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%
- MIG 4.78%, better
- GIGB $2.12
- MIG $0.98
- GIGB $0.18
- MIG $0.07
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- MIG Oct 1, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- MIG Oct 6, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- MIG Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs MIG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GIGB
- MIG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%MIG 6.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30MIG 0.31, better
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%MIG −20.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04MIG 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.