GIGB ranks 4th and UCRD 36th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs UCRD
GIGB −0.32pt a year
0.08%0.40%
GIGB 70.0×the volume
83.7K1.2K
UCRD +0.2pt
−0.2%0.0%
GIGB vs UCRD Performance
−0.8%−0.2%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- UCRD 0.40%
- GIGB $1.04B
- UCRD $147M
- GIGB −0.5%, better
- UCRD −0.6%
- GIGB 4.77%, better
- UCRD 4.26%
- GIGB 2719
- UCRD 514
- GIGB 83.7K sh, better
- UCRD 1.2K sh
- GIGB $44.25
- UCRD $20.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | UCRD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | F20 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54 | C54 |
| Tradability | C45Higher | F5 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A74Higher | C48 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and UCRD are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
UCRDC
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
UCRD Most corporate bond ETFs just track the index. UCRD hands roughly 400 investment-grade corporates to Victory's taxable fixed income team, which runs its own credit research instead of leaning on ratings alone. Income is paid monthly.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
UCRD The Fund seeks maximum current income while limiting undue risk to principal.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs UCRD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs UCRD Cost
Overpaying UCRD vs GIGB
$6,401
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
UCRD 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | UCRD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $723 | $576 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,793 | $2,218 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $8,090 | $6,401 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.40%UCRD
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
UCRD 40th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs UCRD Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%, better
- UCRD 4.26%
- GIGB $2.12
- UCRD $0.89
- GIGB $0.18
- UCRD $0.09
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- UCRD Oct 8, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- UCRD Oct 9, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- UCRD Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs UCRD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GIGB
- UCRD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%UCRD 6.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30UCRD 0.36, better
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%, betterUCRD −22.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04UCRD 1.13
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.