GINC ranks 2nd and NBFC 16th of 23 funds in the Multi-Sector Bond Income Category.
GINC vs NBFC
GINC −0.68pt a year
0.40%1.08%
GINC 5.4×the volume
53K9.81K
GINC vs NBFC Performance
+1.0%+0.6%
- GINC 0.40%, better
- NBFC 1.08%
- GINC $212M
- NBFC $121M
- GINC
- NBFC +2.5%
- GINC
- NBFC 7.24%
- GINC 491
- NBFC 639
- GINC 53K sh, better
- NBFC 9.81K sh
- GINC $48.88
- NBFC $49.24
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GINC | NBFC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | F4 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | A72Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A78Higher | A73 |
| Durability | A81Higher | B67 |
Rank among Multi-Sector Bond Income funds
Same Category. GINC and NBFC are both graded against the same 23 Multi-Sector Bond Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GINCA
NBFCC
In short
NBFC A go-anywhere credit fund. Neuberger Berman's bond team can roam domestic, foreign and emerging-market credit rather than track one index, keeping at least 80% of assets in credit instruments and paying income monthly.
Stated mandate
NBFC The Fund’s primary aim is high current income, with long-term capital appreciation as a secondary aim.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GINC vs NBFC Holdings
How GINC and NBFC differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country81.9%
Sector
No Sector split for GINC and NBFC.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in GINCMore in NBFC | GINC | NBFC |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | GINC +16.0 points | 78.6% | 62.6% |
| Canada | NBFC +4.3 points | 0.9% | 5.2% |
| France | NBFC +2.9 points | 0.4% | 3.3% |
| Netherlands | NBFC +2.1 points | 0.4% | 2.5% |
| Luxembourg | NBFC +1.6 points | 0.1% | 1.7% |
| Germany | NBFC +1.5 points | 0.2% | 1.7% |
| Italy | NBFC +1.2 points | 0.0% | 1.2% |
| Mexico | GINC +1.1 points | 1.6% | 0.5% |
| Other countries (23) | NBFC +3.3 points | 18.0% | 21.3% |
Outside the US: GINC 35% developed, 65% emerging. NBFC 63% developed, 37% emerging.
Concentration
- GINC25.3%
- NBFC29.2%
- GINC486
- NBFC621
Asset class
- GINC
- Fixed Income
- NBFC
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. GINC holds 486 securities, NBFC 621.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GINC vs NBFC Cost
Overpaying NBFC vs GINC
$11,884
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GINC 0.40%
$8,090
NBFC 1.08%
$19,974
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GINC | NBFC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $1,898 | $1,175 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $7,106 | $4,313 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $19,974 | $11,884 |
- 0.40%GINC, cheaper
- 1.08%NBFC
- Middle half of Multi-Sector Bond Income funds
- Median 0.60%
GINC 5th cheapest of 23 funds
NBFC 22nd cheapest of 23 funds
GINC vs NBFC Dividends
- GINC
- NBFC 7.24%
- GINC
- NBFC $3.57
- GINC $0.18
- NBFC $0.28
- GINC Oct 1, 2026
- NBFC Oct 27, 2026
- GINC Oct 7, 2026
- NBFC Oct 30, 2026
- GINC Monthly
- NBFC Monthly
Distribution history
GINC vs NBFC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GINC NBFC 3.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GINC NBFC 0.68
- Worst fall
- GINC NBFC −4.0%
- Market sensitivity
- GINC 0.71NBFC 0.24
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.08% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.08% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.08% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.