Skip to content

GISC vs SMBS

Guggenheim Securitized Income ETF

GISCDNYSE Arca

Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF

SMBSANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SMBS −0.44pt a year

GISC0.47%SMBS0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

SMBS 110.6×the volume

GISC9.16KSMBS1.01M

GISC vs SMBS Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.2%GISC−0.3%SMBS

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. GISC +0.2%. SMBS −0.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−3%−2%−1%1%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GISC 0.47%
SMBS 0.03%, better
Fund size
GISC $93M
SMBS $6.45B
1Y total return
GISC No data
SMBS +0.3%
Yield (12M)
GISC No data
SMBS 5.32%
Holdings
GISC 52
SMBS 4343
Avg volume (30D)
GISC 9.16K sh
SMBS 1.01M sh, better
NAV per share
GISC $49.54
SMBS $24.67
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GISC: Cost 27, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 23, Holdings 20, Durability 13. SMBS: Cost 94, Risk 35, Mission 61, Tradability 68, Holdings 86, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for GISC, SMBS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGISCSMBS
Cost30% weightD27A94Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredB61
Risk15% weightB60HigherD35
Tradability15% weightF23B68Higher
Holdings10% weightF20A86Higher
Durability5% weightF13B60Higher

Rank among Mortgage-Backed Securities funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GISC and SMBS are both graded against the same 24 Mortgage-Backed Securities funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Mortgage-Backed Securities⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

SMBS ranks 4th and GISC 21st of 24 funds in the Mortgage-Backed Securities Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPMBState Street SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETFScore 75
  2. Rank 2AMBBiShares MBS ETFScore 73
  3. Rank 3AVMBSVanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ASMBSSchwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 5BJMTGJPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 20DPMBSPIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 32
  7. Rank 21DGISCGuggenheim Securitized Income ETFScore 31
  8. Rank 21DMBSAngel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETFScore 31
  9. MBSFNot yet graded
  10. MBSXNot yet graded

GISC vs SMBS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GISC vs SMBS Cost

Overpaying GISC vs SMBS

$8,780

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GISC 0.47%

    $9,418

  • SMBS 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GISC 0.47%
  • SMBS 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GISC $9,418SMBS $638

Year by year

YearGISCSMBSOverpaying
10$847$55$792
20$3,261$216$3,045
30$9,418$638$8,780

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%GISC
  • 0.03%SMBS, cheaper
  • Middle half of Mortgage-Backed Securities funds
  • Median 0.38%

SMBS cheapest of 24 funds

GISC 19th cheapest of 24 funds

GISC vs SMBS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GISC No data
SMBS 5.32%
Payout (12M)
GISC No data
SMBS $1.31
Last payment
GISC $0.20
SMBS $0.11
Ex-dividend
GISC Oct 5, 2026
SMBS Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
GISC Oct 9, 2026
SMBS Oct 7, 2026
Frequency
GISC Monthly
SMBS Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

GISCMonthly · 3 paymentsAll GISC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Aug 5, 2026 $0.32; Sep 3, 2026 $0.22; Oct 5, 2026 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
SMBSMonthly · 22 paymentsAll SMBS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 22 payments from 2024 to 2026 YTD. Dec 20, 2024 $0.12; Feb 3, 2025 $0.13; Mar 3, 2025 $0.10; Apr 1, 2025 $0.10; May 1, 2025 $0.03; Jun 2, 2025 $0.11; Jul 1, 2025 $0.11; Aug 1, 2025 $0.12; Sep 2, 2025 $0.11; Oct 1, 2025 $0.11; Nov 3, 2025 $0.12; Dec 1, 2025 $0.10; Dec 19, 2025 $0.10; Feb 2, 2026 $0.11; Mar 2, 2026 $0.11; Apr 1, 2026 $0.10; May 1, 2026 $0.11; Jun 1, 2026 $0.11; Jul 1, 2026 $0.11; Aug 3, 2026 $0.12; Sep 1, 2026 $0.10; Oct 1, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

GISC vs SMBS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GISC No dataSMBS 4.9%since Dec 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GISC No dataSMBS −0.16since Dec 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GISC No dataSMBS −5.2%since Nov 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GISC 0.25SMBS 0.07

Popular comparisons

  • GISCDvsSPMBA

    Guggenheim Securitized Income ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMBSAvsSPMBA

    Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio Mortgage Backed Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GISCDvsMBBA

    Guggenheim Securitized Income ETF · iShares MBS ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMBSAvsMBBA

    Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF · iShares MBS ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GISCDvsVMBSA

    Guggenheim Securitized Income ETF · Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SMBSAvsVMBSA

    Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF · Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.