Skip to content
etf.net

GJUN vs PSMO

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

GJUNCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.36pt a year

GJUN0.85%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GJUN 10.5×the volume

GJUN76.4KPSMO7.3K

3Y return · a year

GJUN +0.1pt

GJUN+12.7%PSMO+12.6%

GJUN vs PSMO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.2%GJUN+10.0%PSMO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GJUN +7.2%. PSMO +10.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GJUN 0.85%
PSMO 0.49%, better
Fund size
GJUN $498M
PSMO $116M
1Y total return
GJUN +7.2%
PSMO +10.0%, better
Holdings
GJUN 3
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
GJUN 76.4K sh, better
PSMO 7.3K sh
NAV per share
GJUN $41.92
PSMO $33.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GJUN: Cost 13, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings 65, Durability 81. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for GJUN, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGJUNPSMO
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC53C54Higher
Tradability15% weightA79HigherB64
Holdings10% weightB65Not scored
Durability5% weightA81HigherB66

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GJUN and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and GJUN 19th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 16CPMARInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  4. Rank 19CGJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 45
  5. Rank 20CGAPRFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - AprilScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GJUNCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

GJUN Rebuilt every June: GJUN follows the price of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a preset cap while absorbing the first 15% of a decline. A cushion with a ceiling, on a fixed annual schedule.

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

GJUN The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined upside cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • GJUN The 15% cushion is written into the fund's terms, not left to a manager's judgment: each June-to-June outcome period aims to absorb the reference ETF's first 15% of losses.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, so the thing being buffered is a fund whose price you can watch tick by tick.
  • June is one rung in First Trust's full twelve-month moderate-buffer series, so the reset month is a choice and laddering across months is straightforward.
  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • GJUN At 0.85% a year it prices above the typical fund in its buffer cohort, a big reason it sits in the lower half of that peer group.
  • Cap and buffer are measured across a full outcome period. Step in mid-period and your remaining cushion and upside room differ from the headline terms.
  • The mandate targets price return, so payouts are not part of the design.
  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full GJUN profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

GJUN vs PSMO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GJUN vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying GJUN vs PSMO

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GJUN 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GJUN 0.85%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GJUN $16,199PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearGJUNPSMOOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GJUN
  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUN 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GJUN vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GJUN None
PSMO None

Distribution history

GJUNAll GJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GJUN vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GJUN 5.7%, betterPSMO 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GJUN 1.36, betterPSMO 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GJUN −11.0%since Jun 2023PSMO −9.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GJUN 0.43PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • GJUNCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GJUNCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GJUNCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.