PSQ ranks 3rd and GLL 24th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
GLL vs PSQ
0.0%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
PSQ 5.1×the volume
2.55M13M
PSQ +2.9pt
−20.9%−18.0%
GLL vs PSQ Performance
−78.7%−42.7%
- GLL 0.95%
- PSQ 0.95%
- GLL $111M
- PSQ $611M
- GLL −5.6%, better
- PSQ −7.0%
- GLL
- PSQ 3.90%
- GLL 1
- PSQ 4
- GLL 2.55M sh
- PSQ 13M sh, better
- GLL $28.57
- PSQ $26.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLL | PSQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | D31 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A98Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | |
| Durability | B67 | A72Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. GLL and PSQ are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLLC
PSQB
In short
GLL Short gold, with the volume knob turned to two. GLL aims for -2x the daily move of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex, it has been running since 2008, and it charges less than the typical leveraged-bear fund.
PSQ The plain short on the Nasdaq-100: PSQ aims for -1x the index's daily move, with no leverage multiplier bolted on. It has been running since 2006, making it one of the original one-for-one bear tools.
Stated mandate
GLL GLL seeks daily results equal to -2 times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex, before fees and expenses.
PSQ The fund is designed to provide -1x exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index's daily price movement, seeking to benefit when that index declines.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLL vs PSQ Holdings
How GLL and PSQ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GLL and 0.0% of PSQ.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for GLL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GLL.
Concentration
- GLL100.0%
- PSQ115.2%
- GLL0
- PSQ4
Asset class
- GLL
- Commodities
- PSQ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in GLL0
- In both0
- Only in PSQ4
Only in GLL
0 securities, 0.0% of GLL by weight
Only in PSQ
4 securities, 100% of PSQ by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf74.06%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-1017.97%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-2917.93%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-175.25%
Weight gaps
GLL and PSQ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLL vs PSQ Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLL 0.95%
$17,869
PSQ 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLL | PSQ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%GLL
- 0.95%PSQ
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
GLL 6th cheapest of 53 funds
PSQ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
GLL vs PSQ Dividends
- GLL
- PSQ 3.90%
- GLL None
- PSQ $1.04
- GLL
- PSQ $0.26
- GLL
- PSQ Sep 23, 2026
- GLL
- PSQ Sep 29, 2026
- GLL
- PSQ Quarterly
Distribution history
GLL vs PSQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GLL
- PSQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLL 38.2%PSQ 16.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GLL −1.10, betterPSQ −1.33
- Worst fall
- GLL −89.8%PSQ −61.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GLL −0.63PSQ −1.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.