VCRM ranks 4th and GMUB 12th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
GMUB vs VCRM
VCRM −0.06pt a year
0.18%0.12%
VCRM 3.2×the volume
214K679K
GMUB vs VCRM Performance
+1.5%+1.1%
- GMUB 0.18%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- GMUB $687M
- VCRM $2.2B
- GMUB +1.5%, better
- VCRM +1.1%
- GMUB 3.43%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- GMUB 917
- VCRM 2588
- GMUB 214K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- GMUB $50.13
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMUB | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B68 | B68 |
| Tradability | B60 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C51 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. GMUB and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMUBA
VCRMA
In short
GMUB Goldman's 2024 muni entry skips the index-hugging playbook: no declared benchmark, roughly 240 bonds chosen by the desk, 0.18% a year. Cheaper than the typical muni fund, pricier than the index giants.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
GMUB The Fund seeks substantial current income that is exempt from regular federal income tax.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMUB vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMUB vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying GMUB vs VCRM
$1,229
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMUB 0.18%
$3,749
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMUB | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $220 | $108 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $859 | $422 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,520 | $1,229 |
- 0.18%GMUB
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
GMUB 12th cheapest of 63 funds
GMUB vs VCRM Dividends
- GMUB 3.43%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- GMUB $1.72
- VCRM $2.82
- GMUB $0.14
- VCRM $0.21
- GMUB Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- GMUB Oct 7, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- GMUB Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
GMUB vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMUB 4.4%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMUB −0.20VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- GMUB −5.3%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- GMUB 0.17VCRM 0.17Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
GMUB and VCRM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
