Skip to content

GOCT vs PSMO

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October

GOCTCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

PSMOBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMO −0.36pt a year

GOCT0.85%PSMO0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GOCT 10.8×the volume

GOCT78.6KPSMO7.3K

3Y return · a year

PSMO +0.4pt

GOCT+12.2%PSMO+12.6%

GOCT vs PSMO Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.9%GOCT+10.0%PSMO

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GOCT +9.9%. PSMO +10.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GOCT 0.85%
PSMO 0.49%, better
Fund size
GOCT $450M
PSMO $116M
1Y total return
GOCT +9.9%
PSMO +10.0%, better
Holdings
GOCT 3
PSMO 3
Avg volume (30D)
GOCT 78.6K sh, better
PSMO 7.3K sh
NAV per share
GOCT $42.84
PSMO $33.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GOCT: Cost 13, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings 53, Durability 70. PSMO: Cost 70, Risk 54, Mission 95, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for GOCT, PSMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGOCTPSMO
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightC54C54
Tradability15% weightA79HigherB64
Holdings10% weightC53Not scored
Durability5% weightA70HigherB66

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GOCT and PSMO are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMO ranks 1st and GOCT 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 20CGNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 43
  4. Rank 20CGOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 43
  5. Rank 20CXOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GOCTCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October

PSMOBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

In short

GOCT The October link in First Trust's moderate-buffer ladder: it follows the price moves of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and absorbs the first 15% of losses over a one-year stretch, in exchange for a cap on gains that resets every October.

PSMO A 15% cushion against SPY's first losses, reset every October, for 0.49% a year. Most defined-outcome funds charge more, and the trade is a cap on the upside that gets set fresh at the start of each period.

Stated mandate

GOCT The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a 12.14% upside cap, while protecting the first 15% of losses during the October 20, 2025–October 16, 2026 outcome period.

PSMO The fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while buffering the first 15% of losses during an approximately one-year outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • GOCT The cushion is contractual, not a hope: the first 15% of the reference ETF's losses across the outcome period, paid for with a ceiling on upside.ftportfolios.com
  • Twelve monthly siblings (GJAN through GDEC) run the same playbook on the same reference fund, so entry dates can be staggered instead of hinging on one October reset.
  • Buffer depth and cap are written into the fund's documents ahead of each yearly period, so the payoff shape is defined by rules rather than a manager's judgment call.ftportfolios.com
  • PSMO Charges 0.49% a year versus a 0.79% median across its 15%-buffer peer group, one of the lower-cost ways to own this structure.
  • Pacer's moderate SOS funds (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ) all price at 0.49%, while the Innovator power-buffer lineup (POCT, PJUL, PJAN) runs 0.79%.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not an abstract index, so what's being buffered is a fund you can watch tick by tick.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • GOCT At 0.85% a year it runs above several buffer peers, including POCT and PJUL at 0.79% and the laddered BUFF at 0.10%.
  • It matches price return only, so the index's dividends sit outside the payoff, and the fund isn't built as an income payer.
  • Shares trade thinly, and the buffer and cap apply in full only across a complete outcome period; buying partway through changes the math.
  • PSMO Buffer and cap are engineered for the full one-year outcome period running October through September. Buy or sell mid-period and you may get neither in full.paceretfs.com
  • Upside stops at a cap reset each October. A runaway rally in the S&P 500 is the scenario this structure hands back in exchange for the 15% cushion.paceretfs.com
  • One of the quieter tickers in the buffer aisle, so spreads and order type matter more here than with the category's household names.

Full GOCT profile⁠

Full PSMO profile⁠

GOCT vs PSMO Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GOCT vs PSMO Cost

Overpaying GOCT vs PSMO

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GOCT 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMO 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GOCT 0.85%
  • PSMO 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GOCT $16,199PSMO $9,792

Year by year

YearGOCTPSMOOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GOCT
  • 0.49%PSMO, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMO 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GOCT 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GOCT vs PSMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
GOCT None
PSMO None

Distribution history

GOCTAll GOCT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMOAll PSMO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GOCT vs PSMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GOCT 5.8%, betterPSMO 5.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GOCT 1.27PSMO 1.31, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GOCT −10.5%since Oct 2023PSMO −9.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GOCT 0.46PSMO 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • GOCTCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GOCTCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GOCTCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMOBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.